Search - 哈尔滨到北京 公里数
Results 1011 - 1020 of 13547 for 哈尔滨到北京 公里数
TCC
Tembec Inc. v. The Queen, 2007 TCC 395
The Queen, 2007 TCC 395 Docket: 2003-3999(IT)G BETWEEN: TEMBEC INC., Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ... if called during the 12 months ending August 1 1997 $14.00 1998 $13.00 1999 $12.00 2000 $11.50 2001 $11.00 2002 $10.50 2003 $10.00 12. ... [45] Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed, with costs. Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 11th day of July 2007. ...
TCC
Tannenbaum v. The Queen, 2005 TCC 13 (Informal Procedure)
Rip " Gerald J. Rip Citation: 2005TCC13 Date: 20050105 Docket: 2003-1130(IT)I BETWEEN: ALLAN TANNENBAUM, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ... He claimed the following expenses in 1998 and 1999: 1998 1999 Interest $ 144.15 $ 117.85 Office expenses $ 1,335.96 $ 645.22 Legal, accounting and other fees $ 402.59 $ 402.59 Rent $ 5,150.60 $ 5,257.36 Travel $ 3,217.19 $ 4,600.18 Telephone and utilities $ 7,178.29 $ 7,233.99 Business taxes $ 846.40 $ 846.40 Capital cost allowance $ 234.29 $ 187.43 Total business expenses $ 18,509.47 $ 19,291.02 Net business income (loss) ($ 18,509.47) ($ 19,291.02) [12] Interest represented bank charges and bank interest. ... Rip DATE OF JUDGMENT: January 5, 2005 APPEARANCES: Agent for the Appellant: Gloria Tannenbaum Counsel for the Respondent: Simon Petit COUNSEL OF RECORD: For the Appellant: Name: Firm: For the Respondent: Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario [1] Obviously, one cannot deduct the cost of, and deduct capital cost allowance, on the same equipment. ...
TCC
Estate of Gordon Noik v. The Queen, 2008 TCC 109 (Informal Procedure)
The Queen, 2008 TCC 109 (Informal Procedure) Docket: 2007-1649(IT)I BETWEEN: ESTATE OF GORDON NOIK, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ____________________________________________________________________ Appeal heard on January 28, 2008, at Toronto, Ontario By: The Honourable Justice M.A.Mogan Appearances: Agent for the Appellant: Murray A. ... Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 21st day of February, 2008. “M.A.Mogan” Mogan D.J. ... Finkelman Counsel for the Respondent: Samantha Hurst COUNSEL OF RECORD: For the Appellant: Name: N/A Firm: For the Respondent: John H. ...
TCC
Bogzaran v. The Queen, 2010 TCC 457 (Informal Procedure)
Woods” Woods J. Citation: 2010 TCC 457 Date: 20100901 Docket: 2009-3318(IT)I BETWEEN: KAYVON BOGZARAN, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ... [35] Each party shall bear their own costs. ... Woods DATE OF JUDGMENT: September 1, 2010 APPEARANCES: For the Appellant: The Appellant himself Counsel for the Respondent: Adam Gotfried Jane Conly (Student-at-law) COUNSEL OF RECORD: For the Appellant: Name: N/A Firm: For the Respondent: Myles J. ...
TCC
Succession Henri Coupal v. The Queen, 2008 TCC 411
The Queen, 2008 TCC 411 Docket: 2006-2770(IT)G BETWEEN: THE ESTATE OF HENRI COUPAL, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ... Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 10th day of July 2008. “Lucie Lamarre” Lamarre J. ...
TCC
Actech Electrical Limited v. M.R.N., 2004 TCC 572
Mogan" Mogan J. Citation: 2004TCC572 Date: 20040819 Docket: 2003-1939(EI), 2003-1940(EI) 2003-1941(EI), 2003-1942(EI) BETWEEN: ACTECH ELECTRICAL LIMITED, GRACE BUNTING, ACTION ELECTRICAL LTD. and BLAKE BUNTING, Appellants, and THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, Respondent. ... Signed at Ottawa, Canada, this 19th day of August, 2004. "M.A. ... Mogan DATE OF JUDGMENT: August 19, 2004 APPEARANCES: Counsel for the Appellants: Deryk Coward Counsel for the Respondent: Mark Hesletine COUNSEL OF RECORD: For the Appellants: Name: Deryk Coward Firm: D'Arcy & Deacon For the Respondent: Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Canada ...
TCC
Goldstein v. The Queen, 2013 TCC 165 (Informal Procedure)
The Queen, 2013 TCC 165 (Informal Procedure) Docket: 2012-1320(IT)I BETWEEN: GITA GOLDSTEIN, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent.____________________________________________________________________ Appeal heard on December 7, 2012 and January 16, 2013 at Toronto, Ontario By: The Honourable Justice J.M. ... the parties shall bear their own costs. Signed at Toronto, Ontario this 21st day of May 2013. ... Woods” Woods J. Citation: 2013 TCC 165 Date: 20130521 Docket: 2012-1320(IT)I BETWEEN: GITA GOLDSTEIN, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ...
TCC
Dufour v. The Queen, docket 2000-1784-IT-I (Informal Procedure)
Reasons f or Judgment Watson, D.J.T.C.C. [1] This appeal was heard under the informal procedure at Montréal, Quebec, on May 4, 2001. [2] In computing his income for the 1995, 1996 and 1997 taxation years, the appellant claimed the amounts of $9,508, $6,390 and $4,075 respectively as losses from carrying on a business. [3] By Notices of Reassessment dated January 18, 1999, the Minister of National Revenue (the "Minister") disallowed the amounts of $9,508 and $6,390 previously allowed for the 1995 and 1996 taxation years. [4] By Notice of Assessment dated March 18, 1999, the Minister disallowed the amount of $4,075 claimed in respect of the 1997 taxation year. [5] On January 28, 2000, the Minister confirmed the Notices of Reassessment and Assessment dated January 18 and March 18, 1999. [6] In making and confirming the reassessments, the Minister made the following assumptions of fact in particular: [TRANSLATION] (a) the appellant has made a career in the Public Service of Canada as a director of various departments within Employment and Immigration Canada in Quebec; (b) the appellant was also a member of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police for one year; (c) during the years in issue, the appellant allegedly operated a business the activities of which were as follows: (i) finding financing and/or taking part in the development of projects in the West Indies, the Caribbean and Africa; (ii) acting as an intermediary in transactions relating to the import and export of various goods; (iii) selling land in the Dominican Republic; (d) the appellant operated his alleged business under the firm name "Info-Caraïbes, Import- Export"; (e) the appellant established no action plan for that alleged business; (f) the appellant has very little training in the operations of the alleged business; (g) since the start of the alleged business in 1990, the appellant has only incurred losses; (h) since the start of the alleged business, the appellant has invested only $1,413; (i) there has been no growth in the gross income of the alleged business since 1990; gross income has not changed and remains at zero; (j) the appellant has devoted very little time to his alleged business; (k) the appellant had no reasonable expectation of earning a profit in carrying on his alleged business; (l) in an initial audit, the Minister gave the appellant the benefit of the doubt with respect to a reasonable expectation of earning a profit in carrying on the business for the 1992, 1993 and 1994 taxation years; (m) the losses claimed in respect of his alleged business constituted personal expenses for the years in issue; (n) in the alternative, if the Court were to conclude that a business was carried on by the appellant, the audit of the expenses claimed by the appellant during the 1995 and 1996 taxation years yielded the following results: (i) the legal fees claimed in 1995 and 1996 were disallowed because they were incurred to defend the appellant's reputation; (ii) the notarial fees claimed in 1995 were disallowed because they were not connected to the appellant's business; (iii) based on his audit, the Minister revised the business losses for the 1995 and 1996 taxation years and changed them to $1,207 and $1,200 respectively (see Appendices 1 and 2). [7] At the hearing, the agent for the appellant admitted the facts alleged in subparagraphs (a), (b) and (l) and denied those alleged in the other subparagraphs of paragraph 14 of the Reply to the Notice of Appeal. [8] The burden of proof is on the appellant. ... Each case stands on its own merits. [9] Extensive case law has addressed the meaning of the expression "reasonable expectation of profit", including the decisions mentioned below. [10] In Moldowan v. ... Sophie Debbané, Revisor APPENDIX 1 1995 Re: Info-Caraïbes Import-Export Claimed Allowed Disallowed Expenses: Rent: 25% of the following expenses: $1,823.36 $ 614.23 $1,209.13 Snow removal 1 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Loan principal and interest 2 $5,244.00 $ 0.00 $5,244.00 Municipal taxes 3 $ 928.70 $ 928.70 $ 0.00 School taxes 4 $ 241.32 $ 241.32 $ 0.00 Heating 5 $ 496.43 $ 496.43 $ 0.00 Electricity 6 $ 0.00 $ 407.46 $ (407.46) Insurance 7 $ 383.00 $ 383.00 $ 0.00 $7,293.45 $2,456.91 $4,836.54 Professional fees: Legal 8 $3,193.60 $ 0.00 $3,193.60 Notarial 9 $3,745.34 $ 0.00 $3,745.34 Accounting 10 $1,139.55 $ 500.00 $ 639.55 $8,078.49 $ 500.00 $7,578.49 Representation: Telecommunications- 90% business 11 $1,001.18 $ 278.11 $ 723.07 Office supplies 12 $ 131.05 $ 131.05 $ 0.00 Associations and dues 13 $ 207.60 $ 207.60 $ 0.00 CCA on equipment 14 $ 90.00 $ 90.00 $ 0.00 $1,429.83 $ 706.76 $ 723.07 Automobile- 50% for business purposes: CCA Insurance Registration Maintenance and repairs Gas and oil Parking Business loss $11,331.68 $1,820.99 $9,510.69 Less: rental expenses (home office) $ 1,823.36 $ 614.23 $1,209.13 Business loss reduced by rental expenses $ 9,508.32 $1,206.76 $8,301.56 APPENDIX 2 1996 Re: Info-Caraïbes Import-Export Claimed Allowed Disallowed Expenses: Rent: 25% of the following expenses: $3,280.64 $ 867.83 $2,412.82 Snow removal 1 $ 250.00 $ 0.00 $ 250.00 Loan principal and interest 2 $ 9,401.27 $ 0.00 $9,401.27 Municipal taxes 3 $ 1,248.80 $1,248.80 $ 0.00 School taxes 4 $ 386.42 $ 386.42 $ 0.00 Heating 5 $ 967.29 $ 967.29 $ 0.00 Electricity 6 $ 455.68 $ 455.68 $ 0.00 Insurance 7 $ 413.11 $ 413.11 $ 0.00 $13,122.57 $3,471.30 $9,651.27 Professional fees: Legal 8 $2,850.00 $ 0.00 $2,850.00 Notarial 9 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 Accounting 10 $ 600.00 $ 0.00 $ 600.00 $3,450.00 $ 0.00 $3,450.00 Representation: 11 $ 300.00 $ 0.00 $ 300.00 Telecommunications- 90% business 12 $ 997.90 $ 277.20 $ 720.70 Office supplies 13 $ 73.16 $ 73.16 $ 0.00 Associations and dues 14 $ 79.61 $ 79.61 $ 0.00 CCA on equipment 15 $ 72.00 $ 72.00 $ 0.00 $ 1,522.67 $ 501.97 $ 1,020.70 Automobile- 50% for business purposes: $1,417.93 $ 698.46 $ 719.47 CCA 16 $1,242.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 42.00 Insurance 17 $ 397.95 $ 397.95 $ 0.00 Registration 18 $ 224.00 $ 224.00 $ 0.00 Maintenance and repairs 19 $ 371.90 $ 371.90 $ 0.00 Gas and oil 20 $ 550.00 $ 550.00 $ 0.00 Parking 21 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 0.00 $2,835.85 $ 2,793.85 $ 42.00 Business loss $9,671.24 $ 2,068.26 $7,602.98 Less: rental expenses (home office) $3,280.64 $ 867.83 $2,412.82 Business loss reduced by rental expenses $6,390.60 $ 1,200.43 $5,190.17 [OFFICIAL ENGLISH TRANSLATION] 2000-1784(IT)I BETWEEN: JEAN-CLAUDE DUFOUR, Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ...
TCC
Arizona Leasing Ltd. v. The Queen, 2011 TCC 347
The Queen, 2011 TCC 347 Docket: 2005-4290(IT)G BETWEEN: ARIZONA LEASING LTD., Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ... Little” Little J. Citation: 2011 TCC 347 Date: July 12, 2011 Docket: 2005-4290(IT)G BETWEEN: ARIZONA LEASING LTD., Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ... AND BETWEEN: Docket: 2005-4297(IT)G 724190 ALBERTA LTD., Appellant, and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, Respondent. ...
TCC
Zhang v. M.N.R., 2013 TCC 61
., 2013 TCC 61 Docket: 2012-2508(EI) BETWEEN: XIAO ZHU ZHANG, Appellant, and THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, Respondent.____________________________________________________________________ Appeal heard on February 8, 2013 at Toronto, Ontario By: The Honourable Justice J.M. ... Signed at Ottawa, Ontario this 20th day of February 2013. “J. M. Woods” Woods J. ... O’Leary COUNSEL OF RECORD: For the Appellant: Name: n/a Firm: For the Respondent: William F. ...