Search - 哈尔滨到北京 公里数

Filter by Type:

Results 921 - 930 of 2942 for 哈尔滨到北京 公里数
News of Note post
. Federal Court of Australia finds that an uberX driver was a taxi driver for GST purposes Email this Content The Australian GST Act requires that all enterprises supplying “taxi travel” (defined as “travel that involves transporting passengers, by taxi or limousine, for fares”) are required to register, even if they otherwise would qualify as being small suppliers (under $75,000 in annual turnover). ...
News of Note post
9 March 2017- 11:05pm Parthiban Tax Court of Canada finds that a UK visitor acquired a new home in Ontario as his primary place of residence Email this Content Boyle J rejected a CRA position that a UK citizen had not bought a new home in Markham as the primary place of residence of his family, as required for purposes of the new housing GST/HST rebate, because his status while in Canada when he agreed to buy it was that of a visitor. ...
News of Note post
Reid Quebec Court of Appeal finds that unless otherwise stipulated, a contract price is exclusive of GST even if the supplier was not registered until invoicing Email this Content A Quebec real estate agent unsuccessfully took the position that a contract specifying a dollar amount for house renovation work to be done for the agent by a contractor (who did not register until the date she invoiced) was inclusive of GST and QST. ...
News of Note post
18 April 2017- 2:32am Zara Tax Court of Canada confirms that 60/40 is “near equal” Email this Content The definition for Canada child benefit purposes of a “shared-custody parent” refers inter alia to a parent residing with the child “on an equal or near equal basis”. ...
News of Note post
21 May 2017- 10:43pm Filion Federal Court of Appeal finds that suspending an action to recover a retiring allowance did not suspend the running of the 7-year s. 60(o.1) limitation period Email this Content The taxpayer was sued by the Quebec government for fraud and breach of trust, and he counter-sued in 2001 to be paid a "retiring allowance" (i.e., termination payment) by the National Assembly. ...
News of Note post
28 May 2017- 10:28pm Fink Attorney General is ordered to answer questions respecting remission relief to other taxpayers re set-off of capital losses against s. 7 benefits Email this Content The taxpayer sought judicial review of a CRA decision not to recommend a remission order to effectively permit the taxpayer to use a capital loss realized on a subsequent disposition of shares acquired under a stock option plan to offset part of the s. 7 benefit recognized on exercise of his options. ...
News of Note post
8 June 2017- 8:19am Hughes Tax Court of Canada prefers the more lenient French version of the repeated-failure-to-file penalty in s. 162(2) to the English version Email this Content One of the conditions for the application of the repeated-failure-to-file penalty of up to 50% under s. 162(2), contained in both the English and French versions, is that CRA have sent a demand under s. 150(2) to file a return for the year, whereas the French version contains an additional condition that the taxpayer have failed to file the return within the time limit specified in the demand. ...
News of Note post
13 June 2017- 1:09am Granofsky Federal Court of Appeal confirms that a taxpayer’s counsel can consent in writing to reassessment of the taxpayer Email this Content S. 169(3) provides that the Minister may at any time reassess, with the consent in writing of “the taxpayer.” ...
News of Note post
28 June 2017- 1:10am Bygrave Federal Court of Appeal finds that reliance by the taxpayer on ignorant advice justified his delay in bringing a s. 167(5) extension application Email this Content The taxpayer was misinformed by his accountant that it was necessary to gather the necessary documentary proof before appealing an assessment which treated his condo gain as on income account, as well as imposing a s. 163(2) penalty. ...
News of Note post
4 July 2017- 12:52am Rona Federal Court of Appeal agrees that an objectionable CRA tactic to gather input for a requirement letter did not preclude a s. 231.2(3) authorizing order Email this Content CRA officials obtained a copy of a form used to open commercial credit on the pretext that they were building contractors, and subsequently used that form in the preparation of a requirement letter to be issued to the taxpayer respecting its business clients. ...

Pages