Search - 司法拍卖网 人民法院

Filter by Type:

Results 1631 - 1640 of 79272 for 司法拍卖网 人民法院
News of Note post
4 May 2021- 10:01am Gervais Auto Quebec Court of Appeal finds that 10% interest on unsecured loans from shareholders was not unreasonable Email this Content The taxpayer financed its inventory of used automobiles held for resale through unsecured loans from the family Holdcos that were its shareholders. ... Before reversing the decision below to confirm these reassessments, the Court of Appeal stated (at para. 13, TaxInterpretations translation): The appellant was not required to make out a prima facie case that the 7.89% rate was unreasonable but, rather, that the assumption, on which the respondent relied in assessing it, that the 10% interest rate deducted from its income for the taxation years in issue was not "reasonable in the circumstances," was prima facie unsound. ... Agence du revenu du Québec, 2021 QCCA 459 under s. 20(1)(c) and General Concepts Onus. ...
News of Note post
21 April 2019- 11:41pm Resource Capital Fund IV LP Full Federal Court of Australia finds that the effecting of a share sale pursuant to an Australian Scheme of Arrangement pointed to an Australian source Email this Content Two Caymans investment LPs with mostly U.S. ... That arrangement took place in Australia, and accordingly, because the scheme was the “proximate” origin of the profits earned, and because of the other connections with Australia summarised by the primary judge including the location of the mine in Western Australia, those profits had a source in Australia. ... Summaries of Commissioner of Taxation v Resource Capital Fund IV LP [2019] FCAFC 51 under s. 152(1), s. 115(1)(a)((ii) and s. 248(1) taxable Canadian property para. ...
News of Note post
16 August 2019- 12:24am Keybrand Foods Tax Court of Canada finds that if A controls de facto B and C, B controls de facto C Email this Content The taxpayer and its parent (BWS) were guarantors of loans to an unrelated corporation (Vidabode) which had defaulted on loans from GE Capital. ... Jorré DJ stated that at the time of this second borrowing: the reasonable expectation was that the company would quickly collapse. ... In finding that this meant that the taxpayer did not deal at arm’s length with Vidabode, so that no ABIL could be claimed, Jorré DJ stated: The practical effect of the casting vote is the same as if BWS has the power to name three out of five directors. S ilicon Graphics is met. ...
News of Note post
13 November 2019- 12:07am Addy Federal Court of Australia finds that the imposition of flat tax on UK working-holiday visa holders contravened the Treaty non-discrimination Article Email this Content The taxpayer, who was a British citizen aged 23, came to Australia on a “working visa” for a 20-month stint, during which period she was found by Logan J to be resident in Australia on ordinary principles. ... A resident “national” of Australia undertaking the same work as did Ms Addy would have the benefit of the tax free threshold. ... Summaries of Addy v Commissioner of Taxation [2019] FCA 1768 under Treaties Income Tax Conventions Art. 25 and ITA s. 2(1). ...
News of Note post
10 August 2020- 11:10pm Addy Federal Court of Australia, Full Court finds that the imposition of flat tax on UK working-holiday visa holders did not contravene the Treaty non-discrimination Article Email this Content The taxpayer, who was a British citizen aged 23, came to Australia on a “working visa” for a 20-month stint, during which period she was found by the Court to be a deemed Australian resident (based on her satisfying a 183-day presence test). ... Commentary warns against “unduly” extending the reach of Art. 24 of the Model Tax Convention (here Art. 25 of the Treaty) to “cover so-called “indirect” discrimination.” ... Summary of Commissioner of Taxation v Addy [2020] FCAFC 135 under Treaties Income Tax Conventions Art. 25. ...
News of Note post
25 June 2023- 11:31pm RBC English Court of Appeal finds that an oil and gas royalty is not income from immovable property under the Canada-U.K. ... She concluded: RBC does not hold, and indeed has never held, an interest in the Buchan field. ... Summaries of Royal Bank of Canada v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2023] EWCA Civ 695 under Treaties Income Tax Conventions Art. 6, Art. 12. ...
News of Note post
1 November 2018- 11:26pm Satyam Australian Full Court finds that a Treaty can impose tax Email this Content The Indian taxpayer (Satyam) argued unsuccessfully before the Full Federal Court of Australia “that tax treaties are, and can only be, exclusively relieving: that is, they are only ever ‘shields not swords’ and not the grant of a standalone taxing power and independent imposition of taxation.” ... Summary of Satyam Computer Services Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2018] FCAFC 172 under Treaties Income Tax Conventions Art. 24. ...
News of Note post
20 October 2020- 11:52pm Vincent Court of Quebec imputes use of the firm’s Quebec establishments to a “silent” partner having departed from KPMG Canada to France in ousting a Quebec-France Treaty exemption Email this Content In May 2012, a Quebec-resident lawyer, who theretofore had been a partner of KPMG Canada, became a resident of France and started working at KPMG France. ... Agence du revenu du Québec, 2020 QCCQ 3605 under Treaties Income Tax Conventions Art. 7 and s. 96(1)(f). ...
News of Note post
1 May 2025- 3:08am Methanex Privy Council confirms that a Barbados IBC was a resident of Barbados for general treaty purposes Email this Content Methanex Trinidad paid U.S.$85.4 million in dividends to its Barbados parent (Methanex Barbados), which promptly paid dividends to its Cayman parent which, in turn, promptly paid dividends to the ultimate Canadian parent (Methanex Canada). ... Summary of Methanex Trinidad (Titan) Unlimited v The Board of Inland Revenue (Trinidad and Tobago) [2025] UKPC 20 under Treaties Income Tax Conventions Art. 10. ...
News of Note post
Jet2.com Court of Appeal of England and Wales applies dominant purpose test to determining whether privilege applies to emails sent to both lawyers and executives Email this Content Is an email protected by legal advice privilege (“LAP”) if it is sent by an executive to multiple recipients, including an in-house lawyer but most of whom are fellow executives? Hickinbottom LJ stated: In respect of a single, multi-addressee email sent simultaneously to various individuals for their advice/comments, including a lawyer for his input, the purpose(s) of the communication need to be identified. If the dominant purpose of the communication is to settle the instructions to the lawyer then that communication will be covered by LAP. ... (on the Application of) [2020] EWCA Civ 35 under s. 232(1) solicitor-client privilege. ...

Pages