Search - 司法拍卖网 人民法院

B.   Analysis [5]   The Crown’s appeal must be dismissed. There are two reasons for this. (1)   The doctrine against relitigation [6]   When the Supreme Court determined the first matter—when it dismissed Mr. ... GAUTHIER J.A.   DATED: JANUARY 19, 2021   WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY: Suzanie Chua   For The Appellant   Matthew Milne-Smith Chenyang Li   For The Respondent   SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Nathalie G. Drouin Deputy Attorney General of Canada   For The Appellant   Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP Toronto, Ontario For The Respondent     ...

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA     PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, QuÉbec   DATE OF HEARING: October 15, 2019   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: RIVOALEN J.A.   ... LOCKE J.A.   DATED: oCTOBER 23, 2019   APPEARANCES: Jason Jane Lipskaia   For The Appellant (Self-represented)   Robert Drummond   For The Respondent   SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Nathalie G. Drouin Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario   For The Respondent     ...

THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE     PLACE OF HEARING: BY ONLINE VIDEOCONFERENCE   DATE OF HEARING: December 1, 2020   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: WOODS J.A. lASKIN j.a. rIVOALEN j.a.   DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: WOODS J.A.   APPEARANCES: Ian R. Dick   For The Appellant   John Chapman Leonard Elias   For The Respondent   SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Hicks Morley Hamilton Stewart Storie LLP Toronto, ON   For The Appellant   Nathalie G. Drouin Deputy Attorney General of Canada For The Respondent     ...

WOODS J.A.     BETWEEN: 1218395 ONTARIO INC. Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on June 13, 2017. ... WOODS J.A.     BETWEEN: 1218395 ONTARIO INC. Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario, on June 13, 2017). ... Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada For The Respondent   ...

MONAGHAN J.A.     BETWEEN: PROCON MINING AND TUNNELLING LTD. Appellant and HIS MAJESTY THE KING Respondent Heard at Vancouver, British Columbia, on December 11, 2023. ... HIS MAJESTY THE KING     PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver, bristish columbia   DATE OF HEARING: December 11, 2023   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: MONAGHAN J.A.   ... MACTAVISH J.A.   DATED: january 2, 2024   APPEARANCES: Joel Nitikman   For The Appellant   Whitney Dun Lalli Deol   For The Respondent   SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Dentons Canada LLP Vancouver, British Columbia   For The Appellant   Shalene Curtis-Micallef Deputy Attorney General of Canada   For The Respondent     ...

MACTAVISH J.A.   BETWEEN:     STEVE PIMENTAL DUQUE     Appellant     and     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN     Respondent   Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on February 3, 2020. ... MACTAVISH J.A.   BETWEEN:     STEVE PIMENTAL DUQUE     Appellant     and     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN     Respondent   REASONS FOR JUDGMENT WEBB J.A. [1]   This is an appeal from the oral judgment rendered by the Tax Court of Canada on February 8, 2019 and signed on February 12, 2019 (Docket No. 2016-3009(GST)G). ... I.   Background [3]   The parties filed a partial agreed statement of facts with the Tax Court. ...

“I agree.   Donald J. Rennie J.A.” “I agree.   Yves de Montigny J.A.” ... DE MONTIGNY J.A.   DATED: january 28, 2021   WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS BY: Emmerson Denney Self-represented   For The Appellant   Carol Calabrese Leonard Elias   For The Respondent   SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Nathalie G. Drouin Deputy Attorney General of Canada For The Respondent     ...

WOODS J.A.     BETWEEN: PAUL LAUZON Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Heard at Toronto, Ontario, on November 23, 2016. ... WEBB J.A.   Date: 20161124 Docket: A-122-16 Citation: 2016 FCA 298 CORAM: STRATAS J.A. ... Pentney Deputy Attorney General of Canada For The Respondent   ...

ATLANTIC TOWING LIMITED et al.     AND DOCKET: A-57-19     STYLE OF CAUSE: HEILTSUK HORIZON MARITIME SERVICES LTD. et al. v. ATLANTIC TOWING LIMITED et al.     AND DOCKET: A-428-19     STYLE OF CAUSE: ATLANTIC TOWING LIMITED v. ... ATLANTIC TOWING LIMITED et al.     AND DOCKET: A-433-19     STYLE OF CAUSE: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA v. ...

To date, we have not received any reply to our letter dated July 4 directing the applicant to submit written representations. [2]                In the circumstances, the respondents' fees are assessed in the amount of $1,800 for the following items of Tariff B: items 2 ($600), 13(a) ($360), 14(a) ($480), 25 ($120) and 26 ($240). ... With respect to the disbursements incurred in this case in the amount of $459.41, they are allowed as such. [3]                The respondents' costs are accordingly assessed and allowed in the amount of $2,259.41. ... DATED AT MONTRÉAL, THE 15TH DAY OF AUGUST 2005 Signed: "Michelle Lamy" MICHELLE LAMY ASSESSMENT OFFICER Certified true translation Aveta Graham                                                  FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL                                                                                                                                    SOLICITORS OF RECORD COURT DOCKET NO.:                              A-703-02 Between: NANCY GOULET                                                                                                                                           Applicant                                                                           AND MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE and TAX COURT OF CANADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA                                                                                                                                   Respondents ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN WRITING PLACE OF ASSESSMENT:                      Montr é al, Quebec REASONS BY MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER DATE OF REASONS:                                 August 15, 2005 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: John Sims Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario                                                                      for the Respondents ...