Search - 司法拍卖网 人民法院
Results 401 - 410 of 2776 for 司法拍卖网 人民法院
Decision summary
MacKinlay v. Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co., [1989] S.TC 898, [1989] UKHL TC, [1989] BTC 587 (HL) -- summary under Paragraph 96(1)(f)
Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co., [1989] S.TC 898, [1989] UKHL TC, [1989] BTC 587 (HL)-- summary under Paragraph 96(1)(f) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 96- Subsection 96(1)- Paragraph 96(1)(f) "salary" to partner is part of profits division Lord Oliver stated (p. 589) that "if, with the agreement of his partners, [a partner] pays himself a 'salary', this merely means that he receives an additional part of the profits before they fall to be divided between the partners in the appropriate proportions. ...
Decision summary
MacKinlay v. Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co., [1989] S.TC 898, [1989] UKHL TC, [1989] BTC 587 (HL) -- summary under Section 96
Arthur Young McClelland Moores & Co., [1989] S.TC 898, [1989] UKHL TC, [1989] BTC 587 (HL)-- summary under Section 96 Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 96 partner salary is a draw In discussing the nature of a partnership, Lord Oliver stated (p. 900): A partner working in the business or undertaking of the partnership is in a very different position from an employee... ...
FCTD (summary)
Johnson & Johnson Inc. v. The Queen, 92 DTC 6373, [1992] 2 CTC 86 (FCTD), aff'd on other grounds 94 DTC 6125, [1994] 1 CTC 244 (FCA) -- summary under Exempt Receipts/Business
Johnson & Johnson Inc. v. The Queen, 92 DTC 6373, [1992] 2 CTC 86 (FCTD), aff'd on other grounds 94 DTC 6125, [1994] 1 CTC 244 (FCA)-- summary under Exempt Receipts/Business Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 9- Exempt Receipts/Business A federal sales tax refund was taxable income given that the receipt was linked to the taxpayer's income-earning process (the price at which the taxpayer sold its products included the federal sales tax, although the taxpayer felt it had no responsibility to pass on the amount of the refund to its customers). ...
FCTD (summary)
Johnson & Johnson Inc. v. The Queen, 92 DTC 6373, [1992] 2 CTC 86 (FCTD), aff'd on other grounds 94 DTC 6125, [1994] 1 CTC 244 (FCA) -- summary under Expense Reimbursement
Johnson & Johnson Inc. v. The Queen, 92 DTC 6373, [1992] 2 CTC 86 (FCTD), aff'd on other grounds 94 DTC 6125, [1994] 1 CTC 244 (FCA)-- summary under Expense Reimbursement Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 9- Expense Reimbursement A federal sales tax refund was taxable income given that the receipt was linked to the taxpayer's income-earning process (the price at which the taxpayer sold its products included the federal sales tax, although the taxpayer felt it had no responsibility to pass on the amount of the refund to its customers). ...
SCC (summary)
Mitsui & Co. (Canada) Ltd. v. Royal Bank of Canada, [1995] 2 SCR 187 -- summary under Subsection 49(3)
Mitsui & Co. (Canada) Ltd. v. Royal Bank of Canada, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 187-- summary under Subsection 49(3) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 49- Subsection 49(3) Major J. noted, with respect to a clause in a lease that gave the lessee the unilateral right to compel the lessor to sell helicopters to the lessee at their reasonable fair market value, that the giving of initial notice by the lessee 120 days prior to the expiry of the lease could not qualify as an "exercise" of the option (irrespective of how the giving of notice was labelled), given that the exercise of an option must lead to a binding contract of a purchase and sale. ...
TCC (summary)
Francis & Associates v. The Queen, 2014 DTC 1146 [at at 3468], 2014 TCC 137 (Informal Procedure) -- summary under Subparagraph 152(4)(a)(i)
Francis & Associates v. The Queen, 2014 DTC 1146 [at at 3468], 2014 TCC 137 (Informal Procedure)-- summary under Subparagraph 152(4)(a)(i) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 152- Subsection 152(4)- Paragraph 152(4)(a)- Subparagraph 152(4)(a)(i) taxpayers held to standard of wise and prudent law partner A review of a law firm's accounts in 2005 by its external accountant revealed various substantial errors for the 2002 to 2004 years. ...
EC summary
MNR v. E.H. Pooler & Co. Ltd., 62 DTC 1321, [1962] CTC 527 (Ex. Ct.) -- summary under Income-Producing Purpose
Pooler & Co. Ltd., 62 DTC 1321, [1962] CTC 527 (Ex. Ct.)-- summary under Income-Producing Purpose Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 18- Subsection 18(1)- Paragraph 18(1)(a)- Income-Producing Purpose TSX fine non-deductible The taxpayer, which carried on business as a stock broker, was required to pay a fine to the T.S.E. as a result of one of its vice-presidents inducing other member firms to open up margin accounts in the names of clients of the taxpayer who subsequently were prosecuted in respect of their trading activities in the stock of a mining company. ...
Decision summary
Customs & Excise Commissioners v. Plantiflor Ltd., [2002] UKHL 33, [2002] 1 WLR 2287, [2002] STC 1132', [2002] BTC 5413 (HL) -- summary under Supply
Customs & Excise Commissioners v. Plantiflor Ltd., [2002] UKHL 33, [2002] 1 WLR 2287, [2002] STC 1132', [2002] BTC 5413 (HL)-- summary under Supply Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 123- Subsection 123(1)- Supply The taxpayer, which sold horticultural products by mail order, indicated in its catalogue that customers would pay an additional charge to cover the costs of postage and packing, and stated "we will then advance all postage charges to Royal Mail on your behalf. ...
Decision summary
Customs & Excise Commissioners v. Plantiflor Ltd., [2002] UKHL 33, [2002] 1 WLR 2287, [2002] STC 1132', [2002] BTC 5413 (HL) -- summary under Subsection 165(1)
Customs & Excise Commissioners v. Plantiflor Ltd., [2002] UKHL 33, [2002] 1 WLR 2287, [2002] STC 1132', [2002] BTC 5413 (HL)-- summary under Subsection 165(1) Summary Under Tax Topics- Excise Tax Act- Section 165- Subsection 165(1) The taxpayer, which sold horticultural products by mail order, indicated in its catalogue that customers would pay an additional charge to cover the costs of postage and packing, and stated "We will then advance all postage charges to Royal Mail on your behalf. ...
Decision summary
St. John Dry Dock & Shipbuilding Co. v. MNR (1944), 2 DTC 663 (Ex Ct) -- summary under Paragraph 12(1)(x)
John Dry Dock & Shipbuilding Co. v. MNR (1944), 2 DTC 663 (Ex Ct)-- summary under Paragraph 12(1)(x) Summary Under Tax Topics- Income Tax Act- Section 12- Subsection 12(1)- Paragraph 12(1)(x) government construction subsidy not received in the course of business Before concluding that a subsidy received by the taxpayer from the federal government, pursuant to a statute, for the construction of a dry dock was a capital receipt, Thorson P. indicated that (at p. 669-670): "The appellant was not entitled to receive nor did receive the subsidy in the course of its trade or business operations or because of them.... ...