Search - 包建铎违纪违法案件以案促改以案促治专题组织生活会 个人对照检查

Filter by Type:

Results 371 - 380 of 23506 for 包建铎违纪违法案件以案促改以案促治专题组织生活会 个人对照检查
FCTD

Pipe & Piling Supplies LTD v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1979] CTC 445, 79 DTC 5364

Pipe & Piling Supplies LTD v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1979] CTC 445, 79 DTC 5364 Cattanach, J:—For reasons similar to those expressed in the motion in Mike Dym and The Queen (Court File No T-64-77) the motion herein is likewise refused. ...
TCC

Seaway-Levy Technical & Financial Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1991] 1 CTC 2260, 91 DTC 323

Seaway-Levy Technical & Financial Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1991] 1 CTC 2260, 91 DTC 323 Sarchuk, T.C.J.:—The appeals of Seaway-Levy Technical & Financial Ltd. (Seaway) are from reassessments of tax with respect to its 1981, 1982 and 1983 taxation years. ... The appellant was incorporated in 1916 and until 1976 was known as Canadian Acme Screw & Gear Ltd. ...
TCC

Laurent Goulet & Fils Inc. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1992] 1 CTC 2419, 92 DTC 1610

It contains, inter alia, the following: LESSEE: Laurent Goulet & Fils Inc. ... Lagueux & Frères Inc., [1974] C.T.C. 687, 74 D.T.C. 6569 (F.C.T.D.); 5. ... Burns Sand & Gravel Ltd. v. M.N.R., [1968] Tax A.B.C. 218, 68 D.T.C. 226; 8. ...
FCA

Trans World Oil & Gas Ltd. v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 37

Trans World Oil & Gas Ltd. v. R., [1998] 3 CTC 37 Pratte J.A.: We do not need to hear you, Mr. ...
SCC

A Janin & Compagnie Limitée v. Minister of National Revenue, [1973] CTC 354, 73 DTC 5267

A Janin & Compagnie Limitée v. Minister of National Revenue, [1973] CTC 354, 73 DTC 5267 Le Juge en chef (oralement au nom de la Cour):—Il ne sera pas nécessaire d’entendre les procureurs de l’intimé. ...
FCTD

Plan € Leasing Limited v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1976] CTC 271

Plan Leasing Limited v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1976] CTC 271 Gibson, J:—For the reasons given in the case of Plan A Leasing Limited v Her Majesty the Queen (Court No T-2224-75) this date, this appeal is allowed with costs, and the matter is directed to be referred back for reassessment not inconsistent with the reasons. ...
TCC

Granby Construction & Equipment Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 2 CTC 2239, 89 DTC 456

Granby Construction & Equipment Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 2 CTC 2239, 89 DTC 456 Lamarre Proulx, T.C.J. ... The question in issue is whether the appellant was right in establishing that debts owed to it by Amix Salvage & Sales Ltd. ... Harvey & Company Limited v. M.N.R., [1988] 1 C.T.C. 2209; 88 D.T.C. 1164, and Romualdo Berretti v. ...
FCA

I.D. Foods Superior Corp. v. Deputy Minister of National Revenue (Customs & Excise), [1998] 3 CTC 227

Deputy Minister of National Revenue (Customs & Excise), [1998] 3 CTC 227 Décary J.A.: Subsection 68(1) of the Customs Act as it read prior to December 1995, required that an appeal of a decision of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal be made with leave of a judge of the Trial Division of the Federal Court within ninety days after the date the decision was made. ... C.A.); Deputy Minister of National Revenue (Customs & Excise) v. Philips Electronics Ltd. (1993), 151 N.R. 178 (Fed. C.A.); Deputy Minister of National Revenue (Customs & Excise) v. Wilbur- Ellis Co. of Canada (1995), 129 D.L.R. (4th) 579 (Fed. ...
NBCA decision

R. v. Mandate Erectors & Welding Ltd., [1999] 2 CTC 211

Mandate Erectors & Welding Ltd., [1999] 2 CTC 211 Per curiam (orally): The appeal is dismissed. ...
FCTD

The Clarkson Company Limited, the Receiver and Manager of the Property and Undertaking of Rapid Data Systems & Equipment Limited v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1977] CTC 560, 77 DTC 5446

The Clarkson Company Limited, the Receiver and Manager of the Property and Undertaking of Rapid Data Systems & Equipment Limited v. ... In N W Robbie & Co, Ltd v Witney Warehouse Co, Ltd, [1963] 3 All ER 613, the Court held that there was no mutuality and therefore no right to set off, but the debt in question had come into existence after the appointment of a receiver. ... Kay, LJ said at page 105: Then it was urged that this claim could not be asserted against the debenture-holders, who had a charge on all the property of the company, inasmuch as Harvey, Brand & Co knew of the debentures. ...

Pages