Search - 侵犯公民个人信息罪 交易明细 计算条数
Results 23451 - 23460 of 23490 for 侵犯公民个人信息罪 交易明细 计算条数
TCC
Nova Corp. Of Alberta v. R., [1996] 1 CTC 2164, 95 DTC 599
At page 87 of his text Construction of Statutes (2nd ed. 1983), Driedger fittingly summarizes the basic principles: “... the words of an Act are to be read in their entire context and in their grammatical and ordinary sense harmoniously with the scheme of the Act, the object of the Act, and the intention of Parliament”. ...
TCC
Robert Kondrat v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1995] 1 CTC 2630, 96 DTC 1566
David Pilkington, a chartered accountant and partner of Hudson & Company, Karon’s accountants, prepared a letter for Kondrat’s solicitor suggesting the shares of Karon in June 1985 "would be worth a value anywhere from $0 indicating the seismic data was worthless and the future earnings potential of the company is not very favourable to a value far exceeding the cost of the seismic data indicating that the seismic data is extremely valuable". ...
FCTD
Sunbeam Corporation (Canada) Limited v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1994] 1 CTC 294
., General Signal and Appliances Ltd. and Black & Decker Ltd. accounted for federal sales tax on small electrical appliances based on such determined values, which were requested by the above-mentioned companies and were authorized by Excise. ...
FCTD
McEwen Brothers Limited v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1994] 1 CTC 317, 94 DTC 6133
.* 256 common Adrien Allard * Chipik Investment Ltd. and Allard Ventures Ltd. became shareholders in July 1976. ...
FCTD
Her Majesty the Queen v. Melville Neuman, [1994] 1 CTC 354, 94 DTC 6094
London & West Riding Investments Ltd., [1967] 1 All E.R. 518, [1967] 2 Q.B. 786 (C.A.) at page 528 (Q.B. 802):.... which are intended by them to give to third parties or to the Court the appearance of creating between the parties legal rights and obligations different from the actual legal rights and obligations (if any) which the parties intend to create. ...
TCC
Melville Neuman v. Minister of National Revenue, [1992] 2 CTC 2074, 92 DTC 1652
Counsel for the respondent contended that the application of subsection 56(2) of the Act is supported by the following facts: (a) the dividend payment was not the product of a bona fide business relationship” (judgment of Dickson, C.J.C. at page 35), but was conceived as part of a tax avoidance plan; (b) the dividend payment was, in effect, a rerouting of monies from New- mac, in which the appellant's wife had no claim or entitlement, that would otherwise have been payable to the appellant; (c) the declaration of a dividend, although normally the function of a director, in this case was the fruit of the appellant's recommendations to his wife; (d) the declaration of the dividend to the appellant's wife from Melru was merely a temporary device for the redirection of the dividend, as the money was immediately lent back to the appellant by his wife on non-commercial terms; and (e) ”... there was no legitimate purpose to the dividend distribution” (judgment of Dickson, C.J. at page 35), within the meaning of the majority judgment in McClurg. ...
FCTD
Canadian Marconi Company v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1989] 2 CTC 128, 89 DTC 5370
The Statute The relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act are found in Part I, Division I — Returns, Assessments, Payment and Appeals. ...
TCC
Alexander Orr v. Minister of National Revenue, [1989] 2 CTC 2348, 89 DTC 557
You are willing to gift approximately $100,000 worth of shares (after a proposed split — see below) in the company to Lance and Kevin in order to obtain maximum tax benefits on a total family unit basis. ...
TCC
Pedro Cabezuelo v. Minister of National Revenue, [1983] CTC 2775, 83 DTC 679
Apart altogether from what has been said concerning the existence of a trust, if superior judicial authority did not cling so tenaciously to the doctrine of the absolute distinction of identity between a corporation and its shareholders as propounded over 85 years ago by the House of Lords in Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd, [1897] AC 22, one might regard a single shareholder corporation like Enterprises in the light of its relationship to the appellant and conclude that in truth and substance what was attempted was to establish a trust under which the settlor, the trustee and the sole beneficiary are the same person, which is not permissible under the law of trusts. ...
T Rev B decision
Sbi Properties Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1981] CTC 2288, 81 DTC 263
. /. The assessment appears to obliterate the distinction between active and passive business which is prescribed in the Income Tax Act. 8. ...