Search - ”资源化利用" resource

Canadian Industrial Gas & Oil Ltd. v. Government of Saskatchewan et al., 80 DLR (3d) 449, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 545 Supreme Court of Canada Canadian Industrial Gas & Oil Ltd. v. ... The concept originated with Holmes J. in Swift & Co. v. United States [40]. It was applied in Stafford & Wallace [41] and in Chicago Board of Trade v. ...

Klyne Properties Ltd. (1981), 126 D.L.R. (3d) 757; Big Quill Resources Inc. v. ... They would pool their resources plus a $700,000 mortgage from the FBDB to purchase the property.  ... He had, at that time, no reason to question O’Connor’s integrity.    65                                If want of due diligence had been a good defence to rectification, relief would likely have been refused in Big Quill Resources Inc. v. ...

It was, however, provided that the provinces might, notwithstanding, levy "taxes, license fees and royalties upon or in respect of natural resources within the-Province. ... The purpose was to apply consistently a principle of not affecting provincial taxation of natural resources in their immediate and direct exploitation. ... Solicitors for Spruce Falls Power & Paper Co. Ltd., respondent: Johnston, Sheard & Johnston. ...

The by-laws, dealing with the rights of the preference shareholders, provided that such shares shall be "entitled out of * * * net earnings * * * to cumulative dividends at the rate of seven per cent. per annum for each and every year in preference and priority to any payment of dividends on common stock and further entitled to priority on any division of the assets of the company to the extent of its repayment in full at par together with any dividends thereon then accrued due and remaining unpaid. ... Such by-laws may provide that the holders of shares of such preference stock shall have the right to select a certain stated proportion of the board of directors, or may give them such other control over the affairs of the company as is considered expedient. * * * * 49. ... The language of the letters patent the said increased capital stock * * * shall be preference stock entitled out of any and all surplus net earnings whenever ascertained to cumulative dividends * * * in preference and priority to any payment of dividends on common stock is claimed by the appellants to limit the preference holders so far as dividends go to the rate of 7 per cent provided. ...

Deloitte & Touche v. Livent Inc. (Receiver of), 2017 SCC 63, [2017] 2 S.C.R. 855       SUPREME COURT OF CANADA   Citation: Deloitte & Touche v. ... (Receiver of), 2017 SCC 63 Appeal Heard: February 15, 2017 Judgment Rendered: December 20, 2017 Docket: 36875   Between:   Deloitte & Touche (now continued as Deloitte LLP) Appellant   and   Livent Inc., through its special receiver and manager Roman Doroniuk Respondent  - and-   Canadian Coalition for Good Governance and Chartered  Professional Accountants of Canada Interveners         Coram: McLachlin C.J. and Karakatsanis, Wagner, Gascon, Côté, Brown and Rowe JJ.   ... Consequently, the increase in Livent’s liquidation deficit which arose from its reliance on the Press Release and Comfort Letter was not a reasonably foreseeable injury. [56]                           This is not to say that Livent had no resources for oversight at the time Deloitte assisted in soliciting investment. ...

[Page 611] The original operations of the company were the utilization of water powers and mineral resources in Newfoundland for the manufacture of a fertilizer. ... Acts, 1867 to 1946, "shall apply to the Province of Newfoundland * * * except in so far as varied by these terms," the repeated references to the B.N.A. ... Act divides the entire legislative field between the Parliament of Canada and the legislatures of the provinces, or as it is stated by Lord Hobhouse: * * * an Act of Parliament which makes an elaborate distribution of the whole field of legislative authority between two legislative bodies * * * Bank of Toronto v. ...

International Corona Resources Ltd., however, should simply be distinguished.                      ... Distinguished:   Lac Minerals Ltd. v. International Corona Resources Ltd., [1989]  2 S.C.R. 574.   ... International Corona Resources Ltd., [1989] 2 S.C.R. 574 by simply distinguishing that case from the present one.                      ...

Energy Resources Conservation Board (Alta.) (1988), 89 A.R. 280; Champion v. ... R‑3.   Authors Cited   Canada.  Canadian Council of Resource and Environment Ministers.  ... Energy Resources Conservation Board (Alta.) (1988), 89 A.R. 280.  Finally, Ms. ...

Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 53, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 471; Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. v. ... The Court of Appeal quoted with approval from Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. v. ... As the Court of Appeal of Alberta noted in Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. v. ...

Toronto:  Carswell, 1986.   Moull, William D.  "The Legal Effect of the Resource Amendment ‑‑ What's New in Section 92A".  ... Government of Saskatchewan, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 42, which underlined the severe limits on provincial power over resources that are mainly exported out of the province, as well as on the provincial power to tax these resources.                      ... Moull, Origins and Meaning of Section 92A:  The 1982 Constitutional Amendment on Resources (1985), 33, at pp. 53-54.                      ...