Search - стрим ешмек шешу

2 June 2021- 11:26pm CIBC – Federal Court of Appeal finds that fees paid by CIBC to Aeroplan were for promotional services, but was not averse to viewing Aeroplan Miles as gift certificates Email this Content The appellant (CIBC) was charged by Aeroplan for the number of Aeroplan Miles that were credited to the cards of CIBC cardholders. ... This may be a boon for cunning drafters and their bag of tricks. … [T]he element that gives the supply commercial efficacy—the predominant element of the supply—is the right to allocate Miles. ... Canada, 2021 FCA 96 under ETA s. 123(1) – supply, s. 181.2, s. 309(1) and Federal Courts Act, s. 27(1.3). ...

The transitional provision indicated that the reduced rate applied inter alia “to any supply … made on or after January 1, 2008.” ... In any event, ETA s. 133 (which, in approximate terms, deems supplies of property to occur when the agreement for their supply is entered into) deemed the agreements to be supplies of the condos, with D’Arcy J. noting in this regard that “[t]he application of section 133 is also not contingent on the existence of the Condo Units at the time the parties entered into the … Agreements ….” ... The Queen, 2022 TCC 56 under ETA s. 133 and s. 225(1) – A(a). ...

She completed the sale of all the shares to the purchaser and used ½ the proceeds to repay the note. ... Favreau J found that the sale of ½ of the taxpayer’s shares to his wife for a note clearly was a tax avoidance transaction: [T]he proceeds from the sale of the shares she purchased were used in full to repay the note.... ... Accordingly, the s. 245(2) assessment of the taxpayer to include all (rather than ½) of the taxable capital gains in his hands was confirmed. ...

In essence, it means ownership for the benefit of the person in question …. ... There was no evidence to suggest that Houmet could have used the funds received for any other purpose [other than to pay for the assignment to it], or that it could benefit from them in any other manner. … Further, Houmet's involvement was entirely ephemeral …. ... Summary of Hargreaves Property Holdings Ltd v Revenue And Customs [2024] EWCA Civ 365 under General Concepts – Ownership. ...

. – Quebec Court of Appeal confirms that a cross-border repo was not an abuse of the s. 17 rule Email this Content The taxpayer (“KQI”), a Canadian operating subsidiary in the Kone multinational group, used group funds advanced to it by a group company (Kone Canada), in part as an interest-bearing loan, to purchase, for a cash purchase price of $394 million, cumulative preferred shares of a US affiliate (Kone USA) from the non-resident affiliated company (Kone BV) to which such shares had recently been issued as a stock dividend. ... After rejecting the sham argument, the Court also rejected the application of the Quebec GAAR, stating: One cannot ignore the fact that financing transactions that are not loans will not generate interest but may provide for other forms of return. … A repo with a reasonable return in the form of dividends does not defeat the OSP [object, spirit and purpose] of Section 127.6. … KQI is taking advantage of … a mismatch between the tax treatment of its income (the dividends from Kone US are not taxable because they are paid out of its exempt surplus) and its expense (the interest in pays to Kone Canada is deductible). … However, the mismatch arises from the Taxation Act and the policies underlying it …. ...

He stated: [A] taxpayer should have the burden to prove, on a balance of probabilities, any facts that are alleged by that taxpayer in their notice of appeal and that are denied by the Crown. … If there are facts that were assumed by the Minister in reassessing a taxpayer and that are not inconsistent with the facts as pled by that taxpayer...the taxpayer [must] prove, on a balance of probabilities, that these facts assumed by the Minister (and which are in dispute and are not exclusively or peculiarly within the Minister’s knowledge) are not correct. … Once all of the evidence is presented, the Tax Court judge should then (and only then) determine whether the taxpayer has satisfied this burden. ... Stratas JA (with whom Woods JA agreed) stated that he found “much of what [Webb JA said] … to be thoughtful, illuminating and attractive,” but also that he declined “to express a definitive opinion on the correctness of his views on this fundamental point.” ... Canada, 2017 FCA 131 under General Concepts – Onus. ...

In finding that Maersk’s fees came within Article 9 rather than 13, Sikri J stated: '[P]rofit' from operation of ships under Article…9 … would necessarily include expenses for earning that income and … [the] more so, when it is found that the business cannot be run without these expenses. This Court … has categorically held that use of [a] facility does not amount to technical services, as technical services denote services catering to the special needs of the person using them and not a facility provided to all. ... Moller Maersk, Supreme Court Of India, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, Civil Appeal No. 2960 of 2017 under Treaties – Art. 8. ...

28 March 2018- 1:05am Fournier – Court of Quebec finds that a taxpayer could reverse an assessment for a taxable benefit by subsequently engaging in self-help rectification Email this Content The ARQ assessed the taxpayer and his wife for taxable benefits for a period of approximately 2 ½ years on the alleged basis that during that period they occupied on a rent-free basis a condo that was owned by a non-arm’s length corporation. ... Apparently well after these assessments, the taxpayer entered into a “correcting” notarial deed with the corporation to move back the date of the transfer of ownership of the condo unit to him from the corporation from the end to the beginning of this 2 ½ year period. ... Agence du revenu du Québec, 2018 QCCQ 786 under General Concepts – Rectification. ...

4 April 2018- 11:40pm Ahlul-Bayt Centre – Federal Court of Appeal refuses to grant an injunction deferring revocation of charitable registration Email this Content CRA indicated to an Ottawa Islamic school (the “Centre”) that it would revoke the Centre’s charitable registration after 30 days by publishing a notice of intention to revoke (based on serious non-compliance). ... He stated: The evidence that significant numbers of parents would withdraw their children from the school within one or two months is … neither clear nor compelling. … While the Centre asserts that “[t]he loss of tuition revenue and the reduction of the donor base for School related fundraising will make [the Centre] financially incapable of operating the School, leading to its closure,” it has not …provided its current budget or other supporting financial information. … Its financial statements for 2016 also show an excess of revenues over expenditures of $307,242. … Neal Armstrong. ...

Pizzitelli J applied the single supply doctrine in finding that the predominant element of what was being supplied by the dealer was an exempt supply of arranging for the insurance – and that the exclusion in (r.4) of the definition of an exempt financial services for promotional and various administrative services did not apply. ... In our case, that is the car buyer who buys the insurance product and he would clearly and objectively know he was buying insurance, not the expertise or training, or commercial efficacy or profitability of the Dealer or its staff as the predominant elements of the transaction, notwithstanding that such services … may have an ancillary role to play in his decision making process…. ... The Queen, 2018 TCC 231 under ETA s. 123(1) – financial service – (r.4). ...