Search - смотреть The King's Speech полный кино

At page 618, I observed, * * * Leprohon v. The City of Ottawa [9] * * * was decided in 1877. ... The King [12] and both decisions are, of course, binding upon this Court. ... Has he the same rights to freedom of speech and discussion at public meetings? ...

Deputy Minister of National Revenue for Customs and Excise, 88 D.T.C. 6096; referred to:   The King v. ... C.R. 69; The King v. Assessors of the Town of Sunny Brae, [1952] 2 S.C.R. 76; Turner v. ... D.), at p. 33.   46                                A helpful encapsulation of these considerations may be found in Lord Wilberforce’s speech in D’Aguiar v. ...

The King, [1925] S.C.R. 45; Bolus‑Revelas‑Bolus Ltd. v. M.N.R., 71 D.T.C. 5153; Royal Trust Co. v. ... Michael Wilson, Budget Papers, Budget Speech, May 1985.  Ottawa:  Department of Finance, 1985.   ... The King, [1925] S.C.R. 45, at p. 55, relates to corporations outside of the farming context, and could arguably be seen as governing the case at bar.  ...

An Act that Proclamations made by the King shall be obeyed (Eng.), 1539, 31 Hen. 8, c. 8. ... King, for the intervener the Canadian Public Health Association.                     ... Their name, Henry VIII clauses, is inspired by the King whose lust for power included the Statute of Proclamations (An Act that Proclamations made by the King shall be obeyed (Eng.), 1539, 31 Hen. 8, c. 8), which elevated the King’s proclamations to have the same legal force as Acts of Parliament (J.  ...

I refrain from quoting from his speech and that of the other Lords who took part in the judgment. ... The King 5, as follows: The decision proceeded upon the ground that the dismissal of the application constituted a refusal to entertain an application which the applicant was legally entitled to have heard and decided on the merits. ... Solicitors for the appellants: Milner, Steer, Dyde, Massie, Layton, Cregan & Macdonnell, Edmonton. ...

King, [1963] 3 All E.R. 521; Eaton v. Moore, [1951] S.C.R. 470; Cavanagh v. ...   (2) Loss of future income:   $   54,272   Fixed at $6,000 per year for 45 years commencing in 1984 when this sum at a discount rate of 7 per cent will have accumulated a fund of $82,008.     Thirdly, non-pecuniary damages   $ 100,000   Fourthly, management fee   $   35,000                                                                              TOTAL damages of Diane Teno   $ 538,394                                                                                                            rounded out at   $ 540,000 The judgments in the amounts aforesaid should be payable in full by all four of the defendants, Wallace Arnold and Brian Arnold, J.B. ...

. * * * (12) From the said judgment the appellant appeals to the Supreme Court of Canada. ... In connection with the appeal certain remarks in The King [Page 154] v. ... Minister of National Revenue [9]; The King v. Noxzema Chemical Co. of Canada Ltd. [10]. ...

Its genesis goes back to at least Magna Carta in 1215, under the fortieth article of which King John made the following undertaking:   To none will we sell, to none will we deny, or delay, right or justice. [Emphasis added.]   That promise was repeated ten years later by King John's son, Henry III, in the words now found near the beginning of the English statute books:   We will sell to no man, we will not deny, or defer, to any man, either Justice or Right. (9 Hen. ... North Carolina, supra, at p. 222, a pending trial "may subject [an accused] to public scorn... and almost certainly will force curtailment of his speech, associations and participation in unpopular causes". ...

At page 503, Viscount Simonds adopted the following passage from the judgment of Rowlatt, J. in The King of the Hellenes v. ... Drukker, [1928] Ch. 877 at 884: 1 ‘ My own opinion is that there is a well recognized rule, which has been enforced for at least 200 years or thereabouts, under which these Courts will not collect the taxes of foreign States for the benefit of the sovereigns of those foreign States; and this is one of those actions which these Courts will not entertain. ’ ’ Various reasons have been suggested for this ancient rule. In his speech in Government of India v. Taylor (supra) Lord Keith of Avonholm having approved of the judgment of Kingsmill Moore, J. in the High Court of Eire in Peter Buchanan Ltd. and Macharg v. ...

Customs Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1 (2nd Supp  .), ss. 17  , 31  , 131  , 153   (c), 159  .   ... Venables interpreted the Mohawk negotiator’s speech at the treaty conference as demonstrating the integrity of trade to Mohawk culture.  ... The respondent's 17th century ancestors were no doubt unaware that some of the Kings in distant Europe were laying claim to sovereignty over Mohawk territory.  ...