Search - отримувати ешмек шешу

Filter by Type:

Results 261 - 270 of 3003 for отримувати ешмек шешу
News of Note post
This result was premised on their having had a November 30, 2013 taxation year which had occurred for Bourgade, but not for Samson (who had a calendar taxation year). ... This is consistent with Jean Coutu. This is not a case where the taxpayer is seeking a tax benefit that he did not anticipate at the time of his tax planning. ... Samson, 2023 QCCA 332 under General Concepts Rectification. ...
News of Note post
10 July 2023- 11:43pm CRA indicates that an s. 104(21) designation can be made re distributing the taxable half of a trust capital gain to a corporate beneficiary who receives no CDA addition Email this Content An inter vivos Canadian resident trust pays an amount equal to its net taxable capital gains for the year to a Canadian private corporation that is a beneficiary and designates that amount pursuant to s. 104(21). ... (a)(i.1) of the capital dividend account definition, there would be no addition to the corporation’s CDA whereas there would be such an addition if both portions of the capital gains were distributed to the corporate beneficiary. ... Summary of 20 June 2023 STEP Roundtable, Q.12 under s. 89(1) CDA (a.1). ...
News of Note post
17 December 2023- 11:24pm 2437299 Ontario Tax Court of Canada finds that major renovations that did not largely “gut” the buildings were not “substantial renovations” Email this Content Russell J found that the appellant had not substantially renovated two Ontario properties, so that their sale was not made by it as a “builder” and were not subject to HST under ETA Sched. ... In applying this method, Russell J accepted that: “[F]looring” in the definition must mean “sub-flooring” as distinguished from whatever flooring was installed covering over the sub-flooring. Putting down a new carpet, or new laminate wood flooring [is not] sufficiently significant to contribute to whether a building might be said to have been “gutted.” ... The King, 2023 TCC 165 under ETA s. 123(1) substantial renovation. ...
News of Note post
26 February 2024- 11:07pm Yao Tax Court of Canada finds that the denial of the CCB benefit to refugee claimants was not contrary to the Charter Email this Content Bocock J held that he was bound by the decision in Almadhoun (2018 FCA 112) that, as a matter of statutory interpretation of s. 122.6 eligible individual- s. ... Regarding s. 7 (security of the person), Bocock J noted the finding in Carter (2015 SCC 5) that security of the person is engaged by “state interference with an individual’s physical or psychological integrity, including any state action that causes physical or serious psychological suffering” and found that “[w]hile the mental health of the [refugees before him] was impacted, this does not constitute a ‘serious and profound effect’ ….” ... The King, 2024 TCC 19 under s. 122.6 eligible individual- s. (e)(ii), Charter, s. 7(1), s. 15(1). ...
News of Note post
28 June 2024- 12:11am Lemay Co Federal Court finds that the taxpayer had a reasonable argument that s. 125.7(5)(a) did not preclude it from making an amended increased CEWS claim Email this Content On audit, CRA determined that Lemay had made Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) claims for periods 6, 7 and 13 to 15 that were excessive to the extent of $311,204 but had underclaimed for periods 8 to 12. ... Later, CRA rejected a further Lemay submission that CRA could accept its additional refund claims by virtue of ss. 164(1)(b) and 152(3.4) on the basis inter alia that s. 125.7(5)(a) limited the amount of the CEWS subsidy to the amount initially claimed by the taxpayer. ... In rejecting such claim, Régimbald J stated: [I]t is not clear, in light of sections 125.7(5), 152(3.4) and 164(1)(b), considered together and which are the subject of the application for judicial review, that the ITA does not allow the Minister to accept an amended prescribed form as requested by the plaintiff. [T]he defendant has therefore not discharged its burden of demonstrating that it is clear and obvious that the interpretation proposed by Lemay has no reasonable chance of acceptance …. ...
News of Note post
12 February 2017- 11:28pm Life Choice Tax Court of Canada finds that there can be no SR&ED without testing Email this Content A naturopathic products company (Life Choice) reviewed the literature and consulted other researchers in order to devise three new naturopathic formulations. ... The Queen, 2017 TCC 21 under s. 248(1) scientific research & experimental development. ...
News of Note post
The s.à r.l. relied on the exclusion in Art. 13(4) of the Canada-Luxembourg Treaty, which provided that the Alta Canada shares were not deemed immovable property (and thus not subject to Canadian capital gains tax) if the Alta Canada licences qualified as property of Alta Canada “in which the business of the company was carried on.” ... It is certainly not the role of the Court to disturb their bargain …. ... The Queen, 2018 TCC 152 under Treaties Income Tax Conventions Art. 13 and s. 245(4). ...
News of Note post
26 November 2018- 2:04am Louie Tax Court of Canada places a temporal limitation on the advantages considered to arise from TFSA swap transactions Email this Content From May 15 to October 17, 2009, the taxpayer directed 71 “swaps” under which TSX-listed shares were transferred between her self-directed TFSA and her taxable trading account at a discount brokerage (“TDW”), or between her TFSA and her self-directed registered retirement savings plan (also with TDW). ... She was troubled that the attributable test had “no easily defined or delineated end point regarding the length of time during which an increase may still be attributed to an impugned transaction” and noted that “A more restrictive interpretation of paragraph (b) avoids these difficulties.” ... The Queen, 2018 TCC 225 under s. 207.01(1) advantage- s. (b)(i), s. 207.05(3), s. 248(10) and General Concepts FMV- shares. ...
News of Note post
30 April 2019- 11:50pm 984274 Alberta Tax Court of Canada finds that CRA had no statutory authority under the Act to recover $1.7M that it had paid to a taxpayer in error Email this Content The taxpayer (“984”) reported a capital gain on its 2003 sale of land on the basis that it had acquired it from its parent (Henro) on a rollover basis. ... However, the resulting 2015 reassessment of 984 could not be justified as valid based on s. 169(3) because the 2010 assessment was itself invalid hence, 984 was not an appealing “taxpayer” referred to in s. 169(3) (as it was not engaged in a valid appeal procedure). This meant that the only basis for justifying the 2015 assessment of 984 was that, pursuant to s. 160.1(1), the 2010 refund represented an amount that had been “refunded to a taxpayer in excess of the amount to which the taxpayer was entitled as a refund under this Act.” ...
News of Note post
15 May 2019- 12:00am Exxonmobil Canada Tax Court of Canada declines to impute notional income to an essential income-generating activity Email this Content A participant in the Hibernia joint venture treated its share of the costs of the initial well in one of the oil reservoirs as SR&ED on the grounds that the well provided experimental validation of the predictions made using an improved systematic and logical methodology (the “reservoir connectivity analysis,” or “RCA”) for evaluating how a reservoir is connected. ... Reg. 1204(3)(a) excluded “income derived from transporting petroleum” from production profits for resource allowance purposes. ... Westar “the authority has established that 'derived from' is a term of wide import"). ...

Pages