Rossiynn Estates Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1974] CTC 185 -- text
Thurlow, J (per curiam) (judgment delivered from the Bench):—We have decided not to hear you Mr Chalmers and Mr Storrow.
Thurlow, J (per curiam) (judgment delivered from the Bench):—We have decided not to hear you Mr Chalmers and Mr Storrow.
Urie, J:—The appellant appeals to this Court from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board dated August 27, 1970, wherein it was held that the respondent properly included in the appellant’s taxable income for the year 1965 the sum of $85,250 derived
Pratte, J (judgment delivered from the Bench):—This is an appeal and a cross-appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division which allowed in part the appellant’s appeal from the reassessment of his income tax for the 1965 taxation year.
Pratte, J:—Plaintiff is appealing from an assessment, dated May 9, 1972, determining the amount of income tax payable by it for the year 1970.
Cattanach, J:—The plaintiffs named in the styles of cause are barristers and solicitors carrying on their profession in partnership under the firm name and style of Holmes, Crowe, Power and Johnston at the City of Red Deer, in the Province of
Thurlow, J (per curiam—judgment delivered from the Bench):—We do not need to hear you Mr Chalmers and Mr Lefebvre. Notwithstanding the very able argument of Mr Vineberg on behalf of the appellant we are all of the opinion that the
Cattanach, J:—This is an appeal by Her Majesty the Queen from a decision by the Tax Review Board whereby the defendant’s appeal from an assessment made by the Minister of National Revenue in respect of the defendant’s taxation year. ending June 30, 1969 was
Cattanach, J:—This is an appeal from an assessment to income tax by the Minister for the plaintiff’s taxation year ending October 31, 1968.
Walsh, J:—This is an appeal by the Minister of National Revenue from a judgment of the Tax Review Board dated April 26, 1972 allowing defendant’s appeal from assessments dated July 14, 1970 for the taxation years 1967 and 1968 whereby the sums
Sheppard, DJ:—The issue is whether the plaintiff Myer Franks Ltd “produced or manufactured in Canada” within paragraph 27(1 )(a) of the Excise Tax Act so as to be liable to pay sales tax of 12%