The Chairman:—This is an appeal by Dr Murray A Heit against a reassessment of the Minister of National Revenue for the 1966 taxation year. This is what is commonly known as a trading case and the issue is whether or not the
The Chairman:—This is an appeal by Zoltan Oly Raz against reassessments of the Minister of National Revenue for the 1968 and 1969 taxation years. The point in issue is whether or not the appellant should be entitled to claim capital cost allowance
The Assistant Chairman:—This is an appeal against an income tax assessment for the 1971 taxation year.
A J Frost:—This is an income tax appeal in respect of the appellant’s 1968 and 1969 taxation years. It was agreed at the opening of the hearing that the appeal of Thomas P Murphy, in respect of assessments for the same taxation
Roland St-Onge (orally):—This appeal is from reassessments dated August 11 and August 27, 1971 made by the respondent with respect to the appellant’s taxation years 1966, 1967, 1968 and 1969.
The Chairman (orally):—This is an appeal by J A Claude Belanger against reassessments of the Minister of National Revenue for the 1970 and 1971 taxation years. The point at issue is whether or not amounts paid by the appellant pursuant to a separation out
The Assistant Chairman:—This is the appeal of Margaret Ann Frappier from an income tax assessment in respect of the 1969 taxation year.
Roland St-Onge (orally: July 6, 1973):—This is an appeal from an assessment dated July 26, 1971, wherein a tax of $81,945.95 was levied in respect of the Estate Tax Act.
The Chairman (orally: December 10, 1973):—This is a difficult case because it is not the usual blatant case that one finds under section 138A. The fact that it is unusual and difficult does not relieve me of the responsibility of coming to a
The Chairman (orally: June 22, 1973):—This is an appeal by Victor M Prescott against an assessment of the Minister of National Revenue for the 1966 and 1967 taxation years. In his notice of appeal the appellant also appeals against the nil
