Walsh, J:—This is an appeal from an assessment dated December 20, 1968 wherein a tax in the amount of $109,050 plus $9,080 was levied in respect of the estate tax of the appellant. Appellant’s appeal against the assessment to the Tax Review Board was

The Associate Chief Justice:—An appeal is brought from the decision of the Tax Review Board of April 28, 1972, allowing appellant’s appeal from an assessment by the Minister for 1966, by which the latter rejected an amount of $115,369.33 which the company claimed

Walsh, J:—These proceedings are based on a reassessment of defendant’s income for 1967 as a result of which additional tax of $222.19 was assessed. Defendant opposed this, the reassessment was confirmed and defendant appealed to the Tax Review Board, where

Urie, J:—These are appeals by way of trial de novo by the plaintiffs from a decision of the Tax Review Board rendered on February 16, 1972 affirming assessments made by the defendant against them in respect of income earned by

Cattanach, J:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board, dated May 21, 1971, whereby the assessment of the appellant by the Minister to income tax for its 1967 taxation year was confirmed.

Sheppard, DJ:—The issue is whether the profit realized by the plaintiff on the resale of property was a capital gain on an investment as the plaintiff contends, or was business income as the Minister of National Revenue contends.

Mahoney, J:—Pursuant to the order of Noël, ACJ made September 27, 1973, the trial of these matters was heard on common evidence at Saskatoon, Saskatchewan on October 23, 1973.

Mahoney, J:—The trials of these causes were, by consent, conducted jointly in Toronto, on October 11 and 12, 1973.

Urie, J:—This is an appeal from the decision of the Tax Appeal Board dated May 27, 1970 with respect to an assessment dated January 3, 1968 for the respondent’s 1965 taxation year, whereby the appellant in computing the respondent’s income for the

Kerr, J:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Income Tax Appeal Board which confirmed the assessment of the appellant’s income for 1969, whereby $9,380.39 claimed by the appellant as a trading loss deduction from income was disallowed on the