Walsh, J:—Plaintiff’s motion to substitute Her Majesty the Queen as plaintiff in place of the Minister of National Revenue in this case was contested by defendant. In making this motion plaintiff relies on the judgments in the cases of Mastino Developments

Kerr, J:—These appeals were heard together. They are in respect of income tax assessments of the appellants for their 1966 and 1967 years. They concern a profit that was made by the appellants on a parcel of 21 acres of vacant land that was purchased

Heald, J:—This is an application by Notice of Motion for an order directing and requiring the defendant in both of the above styled actions to produce and show to counsel for the plaintiffs the income tax returns for the fiscal years ending in 1964, 1965

Heald, J:—This is an appeal from respondent’s reassessment of the appellant’s income tax returns for the 1965 and 1966 taxation years. The pleadings put in issue the profit derived from three separate real estate transactions:

Collier, J:—This is an appeal from an assessment by the respondent which in effect disallowed the appellant’s contention that its income for its fiscal year ending February 28, 1967 was exempt from taxation by virtue of subsection 83(5) of the income

Gibson, J (orally):—In this matter the evidence adduced by the appellant amply proved that the lease contract (Exhibit 5), and the so- called service contract (Exhibit 6), both dated December 31, 1965, were bona fide business transactions, not shams;*

Collier, J:— This is an appeal by a non-resident trust against an assessment by the Minister which seeks to add back into the taxable income of the trust for the year 1969 capital cost deductions previously allowed to the trust. The trust had owned real

Kerr, J:—This is an appeal from the appellant’s income tax assessment for the year 1967.

Collier, J:—The appellant appeals against an assessment in respect to its 1963 income. The respondent, for that year, added to the appellant’s income the sum of $7,459,055.25, the alleged profit realized on the transfer of certain natural gas storage leases to Tecumseh

Pratte, J:—When he declared his income for the years 1955 to 1965, respondent did not allow for the fact that Hull City Transport Ltd, a company in which he was the majority shareholder, had paid one Walter F Thorn annual amounts of $3,000 from 1955