Torduff Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 295, 72 DTC 6266 -- text

Heald, J:—This is an appeal from a reassessment for the taxation year 1967 by which the respondent added to the income of the appellant the sum of $76,846.62 described in the form T7 W-C accompanying said reassessment as “profit on sale of land and

Minister of National Revenue v. Fritz Werner LTD, [1972] CTC 274, 72 DTC 6239 -- text

Walsh, J:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board of February 23, 1971 (reported [1971] Tax ABC 209) allowing the. appeal of the respondent from an income tax assessment dated October 26, 1967 in respect of the year 1965. No new

Harry Richstone v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 274, 72 DTC 6239 -- text

Collier, J:—This appeal from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board, reported [1969] Tax ABC 928, was heard at the same time as the appeal in Louis Richstone v MNR (p 265).

The appellant here died after the decision of the Tax Appeal Board was handed down and before his appeal came on for hearing before this Court.

Richstone v. MNR, 72 DTC 6232, [1972] CTC 265 (FCTD), briefly aff'd 74 DTC 6129 (FCA) -- text

Collier, J:—This is an appeal from the Tax Appeal Board, reported [1969] Tax ABC 928. There is another appeal from the Board by Harry Richstone, a brother of the present appellant. Harry Richstone died during the intervening period, but by agreement these appeals

Dorfman v. M.N.R., 72 DTC 6231, [1972] CTC 264 (FCTD) -- text

Heald, J:—This is an appeal from respondent’s income tax assessment of the appellant for the 1966 taxation year. By agreement of counsel, this appeal was tried together with the appeal of Bernard Lehrer in which latter appeal written Reasons for Judgment have been delivered this day under No T-1381-71 of this Court.

The present appeal arises from the same transaction which gave rise to the appeal of Bernard Lehrer.

Bernard Lehrer v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 255, 72 DTC 6224 -- text

Heald, J:—This is an appeal from respondent’s income tax assessment of the appellant for the 1966 taxation year. What is involved is the sum of $17,862.85 realized by the appellant as profit on the sale of real property owned equally by the appellant and

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS