Edward D Arnold, Jr v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2235, 72 DTC 1199 -- text

A J Frost:—This is an appeal from an income tax assessment dated August 6, 1969 in respect of the appellant’s 1968 taxation year wherein a claim for alimony and maintenance amounting to $7,500 was disallowed as not coming within the meaning of paragraph 11

Estate of Stanley Donald Stankievech v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2232, 72 DTC 1231 -- text

A J Frost:—This is an appeal from an assessment dated May 30, 1968 wherein estate tax in the sum of $15,164.66 was levied on the aggregate taxable value of the property passing on the death of Stanley Donald Stankievech, which occurred on July 15, 1965.

Ross P Alger and Paul a Ferner in Trust for the Children of Sam Hashman v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2227, 72 DTC 1191 -- text

W O Davis:—The appellants herein have appealed from assessments to income tax for the taxation years 1966 and 1967 dated December 9 and 23, 1969, respectively. The issue in respect of both years concerns the correct interpretation of subsections (2), (4), (7) and

Philip Goddard and Jan M Rienstra, Bruce W Shaw (Deceased) v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2206, 72 DTC 1216 -- text

Roland St-Onge:—For the reasons put forward in Leo O Lund v MNR, in which judgment was delivered today, these appeals are also dismissed.

Appeals dismissed.

SWALLOWFIELD FARMS LTD, Appellant,

and •*

MINISTER OF NATIONAL REVENUE, Respondent.

Tax Review Board (J O Weldon, QC), February 17, 1972.

Income Tax Act, RSC 1952, c 148 — 3, 4, 139(1)(e) — Real estate transaction

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS