Laurence George Goodenough and Margaret Olive Devitt, Executors of the Estate of Norman Wright Devitt v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2388, 72 DTC 1337 -- text

Maurice Boisvert:—This is an appeal from an assessment dated October 11, 1970 wherein a tax in the sum of $83,264.81 was levied under the Estate Tax Act (SC 1958, c 29 as amended).

Thomas Pallant v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2378, 72 DTC 1321 -- text

Roland St-Onge:—These appeals were heard at the City of Vancouver, in the Province of British Columbia on October 27, 1971 by the Tax Appeal Board as it was then constituted, and are from reassessments involving the taxation years 1963, 1964, 1965 and 1966.

J G Young & Son Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2370, 72 DTC 1319 -- text

A J Frost:—This is an appeal from an income tax reassessment dated July 28, 1970 varying an earlier assessment dated May 14, 1969 in respect of the appellant’s 1967 taxation year, wherein the Minister of National Revenue levied an additional tax on the gain

Marilyn a Palmer v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2367, 72 DTC 1309 -- text

A J Frost:—This is an appeal from an income tax assessment dated June 24, 1970 in respect of the appellant’s 1968 taxation year. Upon Notice of Objection duly signed and filed, the Minister of National Revenue reconsidered the assessment and confirmed it on April

Weed-Master (Western) LTD v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2364, 72 DTC 1296 -- text

A J Frost:—This appeal, which was heard at Calgary, Alberta on september 27, 1971 by the Tax Appeal Board as it was then constituted, is from assessments in respect of the appellant’s taxation years 1965, 1966 and 1967.

Alfred Wallace Garrard v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2362, 72 DTC 1307 -- text

A J Frost:—This is an income tax appeal in respect of the appellant’s 1968 taxation year. Upon Notice of Objection duly signed and filed the Minister of National Revenue reconsidered the assessment and confirmed it on the ground that the appellant was not in

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS