Gerald J Burns v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2431, 72 DTC 1367 -- text

A J Frost:—This is an appeal from an income tax assessment in respect of the appellant’s 1967 taxation year. Upon notice of objection duly signed and filed, the Minister of National Revenue reconsidered the assessment and confirmed it on the ground that net

Lloyd Nichols and Marvin Shore, Trustee of the Estate of J Alvin Keillor in Bankruptcy v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2424, 72 DTC 1330 -- text

The Chairman (orally):—The appeal heard was that of the taxpayer Lloyd Nichols against notices of reassessment for the taxation years 1964 and 1965. The facts of this appeal are complicated to some extent, and are fully set out in the Notice of Appeal and

Burton for Shoes Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2419, 72 DTC 1363 -- text

The Chairman:—This appeal was brought by the taxpayer against a notice of reassessment for the taxation year 1968 wherein a deduction of $5,000 claimed in respect of a bad business debt written off in that year was disallowed by the Minister of National Revenue

Albert J Lipsett v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2416, 72 DTC 1361 -- text

Lucien Cardin:—This is an income tax appeal from assessments dated June 9, 1970 in respect of the appellant’s 1967 and 1968 taxation years which was heard at Kitchener, Ontario, on March 21, 1971 by Mr J O Weldon, QC, then a member of the Tax Appeal

Bouton Transport Ltee, Campbell Transport Ltee, Northern Quebec Transport LTD v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2407, 72 DTC 1347 -- text

Roland St-Onge:—For the same reasons as those given this day in Crédit La Vérendrye Ltée v MNR, the appeals filed by the above-named companies are dismissed, and the assessments upheld as made.

Credit La Verendrye Ltée v. Minister of National Revenue, [1972] CTC 2404, 72 DTC 1344 -- text

Roland St-Onge:—At the start of the hearing of this appeal at Rouyn, Province of Quebec on April 28, 1971 by the Tax Appeal Board, now the Tax Review Board, it was agreed between the parties that the evidence adduced in this appeal would apply to the

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS