Brilund Mines Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1971] CTC 403, 71 DTC 5218 -- text

GIBSON, J.:—This is an appeal from re-assessments of the appellant’s income for the taxation year 1966 whereby the appel- lant’s income was increased by an amount of $531,706.28, being made up of what was alleged to be a gain of $451,706.23 realized on

Minister of Finance of British Columbia v. Estate of Percival, Archibald, Woodward, [1971] CTC 341 -- text

TYSOE, J.:—This is an appeal by the Minister of Finance from a judgment of Munroe, J. made on July 27, 1970 directing that a writ of certiorari issue to remove into the Supreme Court of British Columbia a determination made by the appellant on May

Deltona Corp. v. MNR, 71 DTC 5186, [1971] CTC 297 (Ex Ct), briefly aff'd 73 DTC 5180, [1973] CTC 215 (SCC) -- text

CATTANACH, J.:—This is an appeal by the appellant, The Deltona Corporation, a corporation incorporated pursuant to the laws of the State of Delaware, one of the United States of America, and resident in the City of Miami, Florida also one of the United

Jordan Page Harshman and Prue Lydia Harshman, Execut‘ors of the Last Will and Testament of Hubert Harry Harshman, Deceased v. Minister of National Revenue, [1971] CTC 288, 71 DTC 5202 -- text

GIBSON, J.:—This is an appeal from an assessment for estate tax made August 1, 1968 whereby tax in the sum of $61,444.95 was levied. This assessment added the sum of $93,828.21 to the estate tax payable for the value of certain inter vivos gifts made by the deceased Hubert Harry Harshman to what is called in these proceedings ‘ The Harshman Foundation’’, and for the value at the date of death of the gift to The Harshman Foundation under the will of the said Hubert Harry Harshman deceased.

Oakfield Developments (Toronto) Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1971] CTC 283, 71 DTC 5175 -- text

JUDSON, J. (all concur) :—The appellant, Oakfield Developments (Toronto) Limited, is a private company provincially created by letters patent of amalgamation dated October 8, 1964. One of its predecessor corporations was Polestar Developments Limited. In respect of its two

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS