BENDAS, D.C.J. (orally) :—This is an appeal by way of trial de novo against the conviction of the appellant in the provincial Magistrates’ Court on the following charge :

TYSOE, J.:—This is an appeal by the Minister of Finance from a judgment of Munroe, J. made on July 27, 1970 directing that a writ of certiorari issue to remove into the Supreme Court of British Columbia a determination made by the appellant on May

JACKETT, P.:—These three appeals by the same appellant from his re-assessments under Part I of the Income Tax Act for the 1963, 1965 and 1966 taxation years, respectively, were heard together.

Kerr, J.:—These two appeals were heard together on the same evidence.

CATTANACH, J.:—This is an appeal by the appellant, The Deltona Corporation, a corporation incorporated pursuant to the laws of the State of Delaware, one of the United States of America, and resident in the City of Miami, Florida also one of the United

GIBSON, J.:—This is an appeal from an assessment for estate tax made August 1, 1968 whereby tax in the sum of $61,444.95 was levied. This assessment added the sum of $93,828.21 to the estate tax payable for the value of certain inter vivos gifts made by the deceased Hubert Harry Harshman to what is called in these proceedings ‘ The Harshman Foundation’’, and for the value at the date of death of the gift to The Harshman Foundation under the will of the said Hubert Harry Harshman deceased.

JUDSON, J. (all concur) :—The appellant, Oakfield Developments (Toronto) Limited, is a private company provincially created by letters patent of amalgamation dated October 8, 1964. One of its predecessor corporations was Polestar Developments Limited. In respect of its two

MARTLAND, J. (all concur) :—This appeal is from the judgment of the Exchequer Court, which dismissed (save as to one agreed item) the appellant’s appeal from the assessment of its income tax, for the taxation year 1963, made by the respondent.

WALSH, J.:—This is an appeal from income tax assessments dated April 28, 1969 for the taxation years 1964 and 1965 of the appellant. On or about September 1, 1964, appellant, a Quebec corporation, established a pension plan for its employees entering into

DUMOULIN, J.:—By a notice of motion, argued in Court this 10th day of March, 1971, the respondent sought to obtain: