JUDSON, J. (concurred in by Fauteux, Abbott, Martland and Ritchie, JJ.) :—I agree with the conclusion of Pigeon, J. that the Supreme Court of Ontario had no jurisdiction to bind the Crown in right of Canada in this matter.
the Queen seeks to recover from the defendant company taxes in
an amount of $110,567.77.
SHEPPARD, D.J.:—This appeal raises the issue of whether or not the appellant company (Consolidated Holding Co. Ltd.) and Martin & Robertson, Ltd. were associated companies in 1963 and 1964 within Section 39 of the Income Tax Act. That issue
SHEPPARD, D.J.:—This appeal is from an assessment by the Minister of National Revenue for adding sums to the income of the appellant as follows :
For 1966:
GIBSON, J.:—These four appeals against re-assessments, all dated April 28, 1965, for income tax of the appellant for the taxation years 1959, 1960, 1961 and 1962, were tried together.
SEATON, J.:—The applicant seeks to invoke the summary procedure in Section 126A of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952,
CATTANACH, J.:—This is an appeal by the executors of the estate of Harris Cox, from an assessment by the Minister under Section 24 of the Estate Tax Act* [1] whereby the Minister included, in computing the aggregate net
SHEPPARD, D.J.:—This appeal is by the Minister of National Revenue on the issue whether or not the respondent, an anaesthetist, should be allowed for the year 1965 automobile expenses for two round trips each day from his home to the Royal Jubilee
KERR, J.:—This is an appeal from income tax assessments in respect of the appellant’s taxation years 1964, 1965 and 1966* [1] whereby the respondent disallowed deductions claimed by the appellant in computing its income as having been paid by it
ABBOTT, J. (concurred in by Fauteux, Martland, Judson, Ritchie and Hall, JJ.) :—This appeal is from a judgment of the Exchequer Court which allowed an appeal under Section 58 of the Excise Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 100, as amended, by
