JESSUP, J.A.:—This is an appeal from the judgment of Hartt, J. dismissing the action with costs.

JACKETT, P.:—This is an appeal by the Minister of National Revenue from a judgment of the Tax Appeal Board dated August 2, 1968 allowing an appeal by the respondent from his re-assessment under Part I of the Income Tax Act for the

GIBSON, J.:—These appeals are from four assessments whereby income tax in the amounts hereinafter set out was levied in respect of income of the appellant for the taxation years 1961 to 1964 :

JUDSON, J. (concurred in by Fauteux, Abbott, Martland and Ritchie, JJ.) :—I agree with the conclusion of Pigeon, J. that the Supreme Court of Ontario had no jurisdiction to bind the Crown in right of Canada in this matter.

DUMOULIN, J :—By means of an Information, Her Majesty

the Queen seeks to recover from the defendant company taxes in

an amount of $110,567.77.

SHEPPARD, D.J.:—This appeal raises the issue of whether or not the appellant company (Consolidated Holding Co. Ltd.) and Martin & Robertson, Ltd. were associated companies in 1963 and 1964 within Section 39 of the Income Tax Act. That issue

SHEPPARD, D.J.:—This appeal is from an assessment by the Minister of National Revenue for adding sums to the income of the appellant as follows :

For 1966:

GIBSON, J.:—These four appeals against re-assessments, all dated April 28, 1965, for income tax of the appellant for the taxation years 1959, 1960, 1961 and 1962, were tried together.

SEATON, J.:—The applicant seeks to invoke the summary procedure in Section 126A of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952,

CATTANACH, J.:—This is an appeal by the executors of the estate of Harris Cox, from an assessment by the Minister under Section 24 of the Estate Tax Act* [1] whereby the Minister included, in computing the aggregate net