John S. Davidson v. Minister of National Revenue., [1968] CTC 136, 68 DTC 5086 -- text

SHEPPARD, D.J.:—The appellant, John 8. Davidson, contends that the sum of $67,546.74 received in 1959 from the sale of shares in Combined Estates Ltd. (formerly Welfar Holdings Ltd.) was capital, and the Minister was in error in including that amount in the

Minister of National Revenue v. Time Motors Limited, [1968] CTC 131, 68 DTC 5081 -- text

GIBSON, J.:—This appeal, from a judgment of the Tax Appeal Board dated December 23, 1966 (42 Tax A.B.C. 400), relates to re-assessments dated May 7, 1965 in respect of the taxation years of the respondent ended June 30, 1961, 1962, and 1963 whereby

Roy A. Hunt, Alfred M. Hunt, Torrence M. Hunt, Roy A. Hunt Jr., Richard McM. Hunt and Mellon National Bank and Trust Company. (Executors or the Estate of Rachel McM. M. Hunt) v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1968] CTC 116, 68 DTC 5075 -- text

ABBOTT, J. (all concur) :—This is an appeal from a judgment of the President of the Exchequer Court, rendered August 18, 1966, whereby it was declared that certain shares of Aluminium Limited were validly seized under a writ of Fieri Facias issued out of the Exchequer Court of Canada.

Attorney General of Canada v. Workmen’s Compensation Board for the Province of British Columbia, [1968] CTC 111 -- text

MUNROE, J.:—Pursuant to the order made herein by Macdonald, J. on August 21, 1967, upon the application of Gulf Log Salvage Co-operative Association for relief by way of interpleader, the said association paid into court to the credit of this cause the

Eugene Lagace an Georges Lagace v. Minister of National Revenue, [1968] CTC 98, 68 DTC 5143 -- text

JACKETT, P. :—These appeals from decisions of the Tax Appeal Board dismissing appeals from the appellants’ assessments under Part I of the Income Tax Act for the 1958 taxation year were heard together in Montreal on January 24 and 25,

Terminal Dock and Warehouse Co. Ltd. v. MNR, 68 DTC 5060, [1968] CTC 78 (Ex Ct), aff'd 68 DTC 5316 (SCC) -- text

SHEPPARD, D.J.:—In this appeal the appellant contends that the discount charged by a bank in 1963 on the appellant’s assignment of certain receivables should be allowed as a deduction from income under Sections 85E(1) and 139(1) (w) of the Income

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS