Lazare Investments Corp. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1975] C.T.C. 2036, 75 D.T.C. 26 -- text

The Chairman (orally: December 11, 1974):

1 This is an appeal by Lazare Investments Corporation against the reassessment of the Minister of National Revenue for the 1972 taxation year.

2 The question to be determined is whether or not the appellant company is carrying on an active business under section 125 of the 1972 Act. All the requirements of the section have been complied with and the only issue is whether the appellant carried on an “active business”.

Bains v. Minister of National Revenue, [1975] C.T.C. 2178, 75 D.T.C. 135 -- text

The Chairman (orally: April 9, 1975):

1 This is an appeal under the former Estate Tax Act by Swarn Kaur Bains and the Canada Trust Company, executors of the estate of Jogindar Singh Bains, who died on or about October 30, 1970.

2 Probate was granted in the Supreme Court of British Columbia to the aforementioned executors on January 27, 1971.

Kruger Pulp & Paper Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1975] C.T.C. 2323, 75 D.T.C. 245 -- text

The Assistant Chairman:

1 These are the appeals of Kruger Pulp & Paper Limited from income tax assessments in respect of the appellant's 1966, 1967, 1968 and 1969 taxation years, which, for the sake of clarity, were divided by the appellant into two separate issues.

R. v. Cyrus J. Moulton Ltd., [1975] C.T.C. 631, 75 D.T.C. 5440 -- text

Thurlow, J (concurred in by Ryan and Le Dain, JJ):

1 This appeal is from a judgment in favour of the respondent pronounced by the Trial Division on a motion under Rule 341. By the judgment it was ordered that the respondent recover the full amount claimed in the action and costs.

Morin v. R., [1975] C.T.C. 106, 75 D.T.C. 5061 -- text

Lacroix, DJ:

1 The plaintiff, an employee of the Government of the Province of Quebec, Department of Revenue, alleges that he filed his income tax return for the taxation year 1971, and that on June 21, 1972 the Deputy Minister of National Revenue issued a notice of assessment, No 43738928, based on the sum of $16,268 instead of the plaintiff's estimate of $14,639.85.

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS