Kimmel v. Minister of National Revenue, [1975] C.T.C. 2045, 75 D.T.C. 59 -- text

Roland St-Onge:

1 This appeal is from a reassessment dated May 10, 1973 with respect to the 1968 taxation year.

2 The appeal came before me on January 30, 1975 at the City of Ottawa, Ontario. At the hearing the parties agreed that the evidence and arguments in the present appeal would also apply to the appeals of Saul Leese, Arnold A Portigal, Morris Schachnow and Jack Rabinovitch.

Prochnau v. Minister of National Revenue, [1975] C.T.C. 2164, 75 D.T.C. 130 -- text

The Chairman (orally; October 29, 1974):

1 This is an appeal by Arnold Prochnau against the reassessment of the Minister of National Revenue for the 1970 taxation year.

2 There is a similar appeal involving his brother Raymond Prochnau, and it is agreed by all parties that the decision in the Arnold Prochnau case will be binding in respect of the Raymond Prochnau case also.

P W Lavack Co. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1975] C.T.C. 2365, 75 D.T.C. 283 -- text

A J Frost:

1 This is an income tax appeal for the appellant's 1971 and 1972 taxation years, wherein the Minister of National Revenue disallowed the following items:

(a) Mortgage interest in the sum of $3,857.64 and life insurance costs of $452.47 in respect of its 1971 taxation year, and

(b) Legal costs of $800 in respect of its 1972 taxation year.

Scott v. Minister of National Revenue, [1975] C.T.C. 2294, 75 D.T.C. 231 -- text

The Chairman:

1 This is an appeal by Raymond Scott, a member of the Canadian Armed Forces, presently stationed in Washington, DC in the United States of America, for the year 1973.

2 The appeal concerns the question of deductibility of moving expenses incurred by the appellant when moved, under orders, from Kingston, Ontario to Washington, DC.

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS