Zimmer v. Minister of National Revenue, [1975] C.T.C. 2150, 75 D.T.C. 123 -- text

A W Prociuk (orally: October 8, 1974):

1 This is an appeal by the appellant, George A Zimmer, from the respondent's reassessment of his income for the years 1967, 1968 and 1969 by notices of reassessment dated April 19, 1972 and confirmed by the respondent on July 19, 1973.

R. v. Anderson, 75 DTC 5393, [1975] C.T.C. 659 #1, [1975] C.T.C. 659, [1975] C.T.C. 658 (FCA), briefly aff'd 77 DTC 5044 (SCC) -- text

Jackett, CJ, Rhodes Smith and Sheppard, DJJ:

1 The reasons for judgment in this case are identical to those given in The Queen v. Herman Hagerman Huestis.

Clark v. Minister of National Revenue, [1975] C.T.C. 2292 #1, 75 D.T.C. 187, [1975] C.T.C. 2292 -- text

Roland St-Onge:

1 Upon reading the consent to judgment filed with this Board to the effect that the decision in Richard Robert Easton v. MNR shall be equally binding in these appeals;

2 It is ordered and adjudged that the appeals in respect of the 1972 taxation year be and the same are hereby allowed in accordance with the terms of the consent to judgment filed.

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS