Bowman T.C.J.:
1 These appeals are from loss determinations made under the Income Tax Act for the 1981, 1982 and 1983 taxation years. The narrow question is whether the cost of “acquiring” zoning from a landowner across the street that would permit a greater density is a cost of land or building or, if neither, whether it is an eligible capital expenditure.
Tremblay T.C.J.:
1 This appeal was heard under the informal procedure on April 29, 1997 at Montréal, Quebec.
2 According to the Notice of Appeal and the Reply to the Notice of Appeal, the question is whether the appellant is entitled to claim a non-refundable equivalent-to-married tax credit of $914.60 ($5,380 × 17%) for a wholly dependent person, his daughter Nadia.
Teskey T.C.J.:
1 The Appellants herein appeal their assessment of income tax for the year 1991. Both Appellants elected the informal procedure and both appeals were heard on common evidence.
Sarchuk T.C.J.:
1 This is an appeal by Eric John (the Appellant) from an assessment of tax with respect to his 1994 taxation year. At issue is the proper application of subsection 118(2) of the Income Tax Act (the Act).
Robertson J.A.:
Lamarre Proulx T.C.J.:
1 These are appeals, heard under the informal procedure, from reassessments made using the net worth method for 1989, 1990 and 1991.
2 The issues concern the accuracy of the calculation of the net worth difference and the imposition of penalties pursuant to s. 163(2) of the Income Tax Act (“the Act”) for each of the years on appeal.
Tanasychuk T.O., T.C.C.:
Gibson J.:
Gibson, J:
1 These four appeals were heard on common evidence.
