Harquail v. The Queen, 99 DTC 1318 (TCC) -- text
McKellar v. The Queen, 2007 DTC 1007, 2007 TCC 266 -- text
Coombs v. Canada (National Revenue), 2013 DTC 5023 [at at 5612], 2012 FC 1499 -- text
Zaluski v. The Queen, 2010 DTC 1231 [at at 3655], 2010 TCC 338 (Informal Procedure) -- text
Morton v. The Queen, 2014 DTC 1093 [at at 3162], 2014 TCC 72 (Informal Procedure) -- text
Minister of National Revenue v. Imperial Oil Co., 60 DTC 1219, [1960] CTC 275, [1960] S.C.R. 735 -- text
JUDSON, J.:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Exchequer Court which allowed the appeal of the respondent company from its 1951 income tax assessment with costs. The company claimed that it was entitled under Regulation 1201 of the Regulations passed
Solomon v. The Queen, 2007 DTC 1715, 2007 TCC 654 (Informal Procedure) -- text
Guay v. Lafleur, 64 DTC 5218, [1964] CTC 350, [1965] SCR 12 -- text
ABBOTT, J. (concurred in by The Chief Justice, Fauteux, Martland, Judson, Ritchie, JJ.) :—The material facts in this case are not in dispute. The sole issue is whether the respondent is entitled to be present and represented by counsel at an inquiry
Gifford v. Canada, 2004 DTC 6120, 2004 SCC 15, [2004] 1 SCR 411 -- text
Pages
