Gill v. R., [1998] 2 C.T.C. 2837 -- text

Garon T.C.J.:

1 These are appeals by each Appellant from income tax assessments for the taxation years 1990, 1991 and 1992.

2 By his reassessments in respect of the Appellant Gurdip Gill, the Minister of National Revenue disallowed expenses in the amounts of $14,918.55, $22,962.55 and $17,519.00 for the 1990, 1991 and 1992 taxation years.

Lee v. R., 98 D.T.C. 1372, [1998] 2 C.T.C. 2720 -- text

Rowe D.J.T.C.:

1 This is an application for a time extension for filing a Notice of Appeal from a Notice of Confirmation dated November 4th, 1996 and there was also a Notice of Reassessment, in respect of the Appellant's 1993 taxation year, of the same date. The reason for the application as set out in paragraph 1 was as follows: The Applicant had a bona fide intention to appeal to the Court and would have done so within the time period prescribed by the Act had he been aware of the proper appeal procedure.

Burstow v. R., [1997] 3 C.T.C. 2540 -- text

O'Connor T.C.J.:

1 These appeals were heard in Toronto, Ontario on June 3, 1997 pursuant to the Informal Procedure of this Court.

2 Although there were originally three issues, it was agreed at the hearing that only one issue remained, namely, was the Appellant entitled in the years 1989 through 1992 to capital cost allowance deductions with respect to his yacht charter operation?

Lessard v. R., [1998] 2 C.T.C. 2582 -- text

Tremblay T.C.J.:

1 This appeal was heard under the informal procedure at Montréal, Quebec, on April 29, 1997.

1. Point at Issue

2 According to the Notice of Appeal and the Reply to the Notice of Appeal, the point at issue is whether the appellant is correct in claiming a non-refundable disability tax credit of $1,439.22 ($8,466 × 17%) for a dependant, his son Éric, in computing his income for the 1994 taxation year.

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS