Lamarre T.C.J.:

1 This is an appeal under the informal procedure from an assessment issued by the Minister of National Revenue (“Minister”) against the appellant for the 1994 taxation year denying her the non-refundable tax credit for a dependant having an impairment under subsection 118.3(2) of the Income Tax Act (“Act”).

Watson D.J.T.C.:

1 This appeal was heard under the Informal Procedure in London, Ontario, on May 5, 1997.

2 In computing income for the 1993 taxation year, the Appellant deducted the amount of $2,816.94 as other employment expenses. In reassessing the Appellant for this taxation year, the Minister of National Revenue (the “Minister”) reduced the deduction of the expenses in the year to $1,157.97.

Rip T.C.J.:

1 Egbert Andrew Williams has appealed assessments made under the Income Tax Act (“Act”) for the 1991 and 1992 taxation years on the basis that he be permitted to deduct expenses incurred in the renting of units in a building in which he resided.

Hamlyn T.C.J.:

1 The Appellant in these income tax appeals seeks the determination of a question of law under paragraph 58(1)(a) of the Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure).

McArthur T.C.J.:

Tremblay T.C.J.:

1 This appeal was heard under the informal procedure at Montréal, Quebec, on October 21, 1996.

1. Point at Issue

2 According to the Notice of Appeal and the Reply to the Notice of Appeal, the point at issue is whether the appellant was correct in claiming amounts of $13,733 for 1992 and $9,263 for 1993 as business losses (ALGA Enterprise).

Sobier T.C.J.:

Hamlyn T.C.J.:

1 This appeal is in respect to the Appellant's 1990 taxation year.

2 In computing his income for the 1990 taxation year, the Appellant did not include in his income an amount of $70,000 pursuant to subsection 146(10) of the Income Tax Act (the “Act”).

Bowman T.C.J. (Orally):

1 These are my reasons for judgment in the case of William Brown v. Her Majesty the Queen, 97-748(IT)I.

2 These appeals are from assessments for the 1993 and 1994 taxation years. They involve the deductibility of certain expenses claimed by the appellant in the computation of his income for those years in carrying on a business. The appellant is a systems analyst, a computer consultant.

Lamarre Proulx T.C.J.:

1 This is an appeal under the informal procedure for the 1989 and 1990 taxation years. The point at issue is whether the appellant is entitled, for these taxation years, to a tax credit for persons with a severe and prolonged mental impairment within the meaning of sections 118.3 and 118.4 of the Income Tax Act (the “Act”).