Delage-Moore v. Minister of National Revenue, [1975] C.T.C. 2204, 75 D.T.C. 182 -- text

The Assistant Chairman (orally: May 14, 1975):

1 The motion submitted to the Tax Review Board by respondent, to be excused from failing to plead in Mariette Delage-Moore v. MNR, is allowed.

2 In view of the various interpretations of Rule 7 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure in Appeals to the Tax Review Board, which this motion concerns, the Board takes this opportunity to clarify it through an order of the Board.

Whittall Estate v. Minister of Finance of British Columbia, [1975] C.T.C. 401 -- text

Kirke Smith, J (in Chambers):

1 This is an appeal by the executors of the estate of the late Hubert Victor LaFontaine Whittall, pursuant to the Succession Duty Act, RSBC 1960, c 372, section 44 (re-enacted 1963, c 44, s 22), from the affirmation by the respondent Minister of Finance on May 3, 1974 of a revised statement of succession duties assessed against the estate of the late Mr Whittall, this revised assessment being dated September 12, 1973.

Golden Oak Investments Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1975] C.T.C. 2220, 75 D.T.C. 180 -- text

A J Frost:

1 I shall now give my decision in this income tax appeal in respect of the appellant's 1969, 1970 and 1971 taxation years.

2 The question at issue herein is whether or not the gain of $79,881.06 realized on the sale of a trailer park owned by the appellant company is income within the meaning of sections 3 and 4 and paragraph 139(1)(e) of the former Income Tax Act.

Raymond Estate v. Minister of National Revenue, [1975] C.T.C. 2058, 75 D.T.C. 53 -- text

Roland St-Onge:

1 This appeal is from a reassessment against the Estate of the late Honourable Jean Raymond who died on February 7, 1970 and concerns the evaluation of common and preferred shares of Candiac Development Corp as of February 7, 1970 the date of the death of the late Honourable Jean Raymond.

Karmel Apartments Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1975] C.T.C. 2130, 75 D.T.C. 116 -- text

A W Prociuk (orally: September 17, 1974):

1 This is the appeal of Karmel Apartments Ltd. The issue in this appeal is whether or not the net profit in the sum of $46,041.21 on the sale in December 1969 of a 20-suite apartment block, located at 70 East Sixth Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, and owned by the appellant company, is taxable.

R. v. Scheller, [1975] C.T.C. 601, 75 D.T.C. 5406 -- text

Cattanach, J:

1 This is an appeal by the Minister from a judgment of the Tax Review Board whereby an amount claimed by the defendant as a deduction in computing his income for his 1972 taxation year was allowed.

2 In computing his income for the 1972 taxation year the defendant claimed deductions from income as follows:
  • (i) $1,500 in respect of himself;

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS