Burstow v. R., [1997] 3 C.T.C. 2540 -- text

O'Connor T.C.J.:

1 These appeals were heard in Toronto, Ontario on June 3, 1997 pursuant to the Informal Procedure of this Court.

2 Although there were originally three issues, it was agreed at the hearing that only one issue remained, namely, was the Appellant entitled in the years 1989 through 1992 to capital cost allowance deductions with respect to his yacht charter operation?

Lessard v. R., [1998] 2 C.T.C. 2582 -- text

Tremblay T.C.J.:

1 This appeal was heard under the informal procedure at Montréal, Quebec, on April 29, 1997.

1. Point at Issue

2 According to the Notice of Appeal and the Reply to the Notice of Appeal, the point at issue is whether the appellant is correct in claiming a non-refundable disability tax credit of $1,439.22 ($8,466 × 17%) for a dependant, his son Éric, in computing his income for the 1994 taxation year.

Mendes-Roux v. R., [1998] 2 C.T.C. 2274 -- text

Léger D.J.T.C.:

1 The Appellant, who happens to be a lawyer, was employed with the Translation Bureau of New Brunswick for a period of seven years from 1987 to 1993. She acted as co-ordinator for Court interpreters. Her place of work was Bathurst, New Brunswick. The employment consisted of training, evaluating court interpreters and being a liaison officer between judges, lawyers, court interpreters and the Translation Bureau.

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS