Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police v. Omar Ahmed Khadr -- text

Bootsman v. R., [1998] 2 C.T.C. 2452 -- text

Beaubier T.C.J.:

1 This appeal pursuant to the Informal Procedures was heard in Vancouver, British Columbia on January 9, 1998. The Appellant was the only witness.

2 In his 1994 income tax return, the Appellant claimed two deductions respecting a move from Edmonton to Surrey, B.C. where he had obtained a new job with a small corporation. Moving expenses claimed of $17,365 were allowed. The second claim “Home Variance Allowance” of $4,634 was not. He appealed.

Shell Canada Ltd. v. R., 97 D.T.C. 395, [1997] 3 C.T.C. 2238 -- text

Christie, A.C.J.T.C.:

1 What is in issue in these appeals is whether in reassessing Shell Canada Limited (“Shell”) regarding its liability to income tax the Minister of National Revenue (“the Minister”) erred

  • (i) in disallowing $4,874,796 of the $15,519,491 interest deduction claimed by Shell in respect of its 1992 taxation year;

  • (ii) in disallowing $1,675,643 of the $5,621,113 interest deduction claimed by Shell in respect of its 1993 taxation year; and

Owen Holdings Ltd. v. R., 97 D.T.C. 380, [1997] 3 C.T.C. 2313 -- text

Rip T.C.J.:

1 On November 21, 1996 I heard motions by Owen Holdings Ltd., the appellant, and Her Majesty the Queen, the respondent. The genesis of the motions was orders issued by me on June 27, 1996, September 11, 1996 and September 26, 1996. The motions by the respondent were for orders, amongst other things, to stay or vary my order of June 27, 1996 by the motion by the appellant was to allow its appeal.

Shamita Inc. v. R., [1998] 2 C.T.C. 2974 -- text

Watson D.J.T.C.:

1 This appeal was heard at Rimouski, Quebec on May 22, 1996.

2 In its income tax return for the taxation year ending December 31, 1993 the appellant requested the following deductions:
  • small business deduction (subsection 125(1) of the Income Tax Act (the “Act”)), $16,494;

  • manufacturing and processing profits deduction (s. 125.1(1) of the Act), $495.

De Francesco v. R., [1997] 3 C.T.C. 2649 -- text

Beaubier T.C.J. (orally):

1 THE REGISTRAR: This is De Francesco for judgment. The time is 9:17.

2 HIS HONOUR: All right. This appeal, pursuant to the Informal Procedure, was heard at Toronto, Ontario at April 9, 1997. The Appellant was the only witness.

3 The Appellant has appealed the disallowance of his claim for a disability tax credit for his 1993 taxation year.

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS