Burnet v. Minister of National Revenue, [1997] 3 C.T.C. 192, 97 D.T.C. 5346 -- text

Tremblay-Lamer J.:

1 The Applicant seeks an Order of mandamus compelling the Respondent to issue to her, pursuant to subsection 152(1.1) of the Income Tax Act (Canada),[FN1: <p>R.S.C. 1952, c. 148, as amended.</p>] a Notice of Determination of Loss for her 1987 taxation year in an amount not less than $260,460.

Shell Canada Ltd. v. R., [1998] 2 C.T.C. 207, (sub nom. R. v. Shell Canada Ltd.) 98 D.T.C. 6177 -- text

Linden J.A.:

Introduction

1 The question to be decided on this appeal is whether a sophisticated financing plan to obtain for Shell Canada Ltd. (Shell) 100 million U.S. dollars, (US$) utilizing a “Kiwi” loan and certain hedging transactions, has succeeded in reducing the tax that otherwise would be payable.

Interfaith Development Education Assn., Burlington v. Minister of National Revenue, 97 DTC 5424, [1997] 3 C.T.C. 271 (FCA) -- text

Stone J.A.:

1 The appellant, a corporation without share capital, was incorporated under the laws of Ontario by Letters Patent dated September 11, 1985, for the following purposes:

(a) To educate the public and encourage an awareness and understanding of social justice conditions;

(b) To interact with local development and justice organizations as well as churches and missions to further such educational programs.

Burstow v. R., 98 D.T.C. 1418, [1998] 2 C.T.C. 2746 -- text

Guenette Reg.:

1 This taxation came on for hearing by means of a telephone conference call on November 28, 1997. It follows a judgment of the Honourable Judge O'Connor, dated June 13, 1997, who allowed the appeal with costs. The Appellant represented himself, and the Respondent was represented by Mrs. Sanjana Bhatia.

2 The only item on the Appellant's Bill of Costs is a claim for:
  • D. Other disbursements: $6,955 (supporting invoice attached).

Camozzi v. R., [1997] 3 C.T.C. 2661 -- text

Teskey T.C.J.:

1 The Appellant in his Notice of Appeal, wherein he appeals his 1990, 1991 and 1992 assessment of income tax, elected the informal procedure.

Issue

2 The sole issue herein is whether F.D.I. Financial Development Inc. (“F.D.I.”), was the beneficial owner of certain rental properties or does it hold a one-half interest in the title to these properties in trust for, or as agent for, the Appellant herein.

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS