De Francesco v. R., [1997] 3 C.T.C. 2649 -- text

Beaubier T.C.J. (orally):

1 THE REGISTRAR: This is De Francesco for judgment. The time is 9:17.

2 HIS HONOUR: All right. This appeal, pursuant to the Informal Procedure, was heard at Toronto, Ontario at April 9, 1997. The Appellant was the only witness.

3 The Appellant has appealed the disallowance of his claim for a disability tax credit for his 1993 taxation year.

Macdonald v. R., [1997] 3 C.T.C. 2195 -- text

Taylor T.C.J.:

1 This is an appeal heard in Toronto, Ontario, on December 3, 1996, against income tax assessments for the years 1992 and 1993. The essential elements of the Notice of Appeal, and the Reply to the Notice of Appeal are as follows:

Notice of Appeal

Material Facts

1. In 1992 and 1993 the Appellant duly reported his income for the 1992 and 1993 taxation years.

Lauzon v. R., [1998] 2 C.T.C. 2529 -- text

Tardif T.C.J.:

1 The point at issue is whether the appellant was entitled to the child tax benefit for July and August 1993. The respondent claims that the benefit was payable to the child's father, relying in particular on sections 122.6 to 122.64 and subsection 248(1) of the Income Tax Act (the “Act”) and sections 6300, 6301 and 6302 of the Income Tax Regulations (the “Regulations”).

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS