THURLOW, J.:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Tax Appeal Board which allowed in part an appeal by the appellant against an assessment of income tax for the year 1954. The matter in issue is the right of the appellant to a deduction, in
Noel, .:—The appeal herein was dealt with by consent on the same evidence and argument as that of the appeal in the case of Clifton Lane, in which written reasons for judgment have been delivered this day under No. A-59 of this Court.
Noel, J.:—The appeal herein was dealt with by consent on the same evidence and argument as that of the appeal in the case of Clifton Lane, in which written reasons for judgment have been delivered this day under No. A-59 of this Court.
Noel, e appeal herein was dealt with by consent on the same evidence and argument as that of the appeal in the case of Clifton Lane, in which written reasons for judgment have been delivered this day under No. A-59 of this Court.
Noel, J.:—As the respondent herein did not appear at the opening of the hearing and informed the Court through her solicitors that she did not wish to take any further part in the proceedings, the present appeal is allowed on the basis that the assessment against her carries with it a presumption of validity which she had the burden of reversing and which she has failed to do. There will, however, be no costs.
Judgment accordingly.
NOEL, J.:—The appeal herein was dealt with by consent on the same evidence and argument as that of the appeal in the case of Clifton Lane, in which written reasons for judgment have been delivered this day under No. A-59 of this Court.
Noel, J.:—The appeal herein was dealt with by consent on the same evidence and argument as that of the appeal in the ease of Clifton Lane, in which written reasons for judgment have been delivered this day under No. A-59 of this Court.
Noel, J.:—The appeal herein was dealt with by consent on the same evidence and argument as that of the appeal in the case of Clifton Lane, in which written reasons for judgment have been delivered this day under No. A-59 of this Court.
N OEL, J.:—This is an appeal by the Minister of National Revenue from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board (26 Tax A.B.C. 129) setting aside the taxes levied against the respondent in the sum of $4,541.23 for the taxation year 1954; $9,174.08 and
CATTANACH, J.:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Tax Appeal Board (25 Tax A.B.C. 225) dismissing an appeal by the appellant from assessments of income tax for the taxation years ending December 31, 1956 and December 31, 1997.
