Atlantic Engine Rebuilders Ltd. v. MNR, 64 DTC 5178, [1964] CTC 268, [1964] CTC 267, aff'd on different grounds 67 DTC 5155, [1967] CTC 230, [1967] S.C.R. 477 -- text

THURLOW, J.:—The issue in this appeal, which is from a re-assessment of income tax for the year 1958, is the liability of the appellant for tax in respect of a sum of $38,213.00 representing the balance of amounts known in the appellant’s business

Minister of National Revenue v. Corinne M. Thibeault, [1964] CTC 232, 64 DTC 5151 -- text

KEARNEY, J.:—This is an appeal by the Minister from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board (28 Tax A.B.C. 248) dated January 9, 1962, which maintained to the extent hereinafter mentioned appeals taken by the respondent concerning the income tax reassessments levied

Donald J. Plumb v. Minister of National Revenue, [1964] CTC 228, 64 DTC 5145 -- text

CATTANACH, J.:—The appellant appeals against his income tax assessments for the 1956, 1957 and 1958 taxation years. The sole issue is whether premiums (the amounts of which are not in dispute) paid on behalf of the appellant by his employer on two

Helen Ryrie Bickle, Judith Ryrie Wilder, William Price Wilder and Chartered Trust Company (Executors of the Estate of Edward William Bickle) v. Minister of National Revenue, [1964] CTC 208, 64 DTC 5134 -- text

Gibson, J.:—This is an appeal by the executors of the estate of Edward William Bickle under the Estate Tax Act, S.C. 1958,

Minister of National Revenue v. Premium Iron Ores Limited, [1964] CTC 202, 64 DTC 5131 -- text

CATTANACH, J.:—This is an appeal by the Minister of National Revenue from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board (21 Tax A.B.C. 178) allowing appeals by the respondent from its income tax assessments for 1951 and 1952 under the Income Tax Act,

David Walfish v. Minister of National Revenue, [1964] CTC 190, 64 DTC 5121 -- text

Gibson, J.:—This is an appeal by the appellant from the income tax assessments made by the respondent, dated October 15, 1962 wherein taxes in the sums of $9,371.12, $1,765.25, $17,296.93 and $11,563.13 were levied in respect of the income of the appellant

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS