DUMOULIN, J.:—The Minister of National Revenue has filed this appeal against a decision, dated November 26, 1959, of the Income Tax Appeal Board, 23 Tax A.B.C. 120, affirming respondent’s objection to a re-assessment of its income tax for 1953.

DUMOULIN, J.:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board, dated September 26, 1961 (27 Tax A.B.C. 408) dismissing Hargal Oils’ appeal in respect of the re-assessment of its income tax for 1958.

THURLOW, J.:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Tax Appeal Board allowing an appeal by the respondent and vacat- ing à re-assessment of income tax for the year 1958. The matter in issue is the deductibility in computing income for income tax

NOEL, J.:—Pour l’année 1951, M. Georges St-Aubin, de Montréal, qui se déclare industriel mais qui en fait de marchand de fourrures est devenu hotelier, se vit imposer sur son revenu une taxe additionnelle afférent à un profit de $80,070.32 réalisé sur des

NOEL, J.:—This is an appeal against the appellant’s income tax assessments for the years 1955, 1956, 1957 and 1958. In his assessments, the respondent added to the appellant’s reported income for each of the above mentioned years the sums of $1,725, $33,878.30,

Noel, J.:—Continental Air Photo Ltd., the suppliant in this case, is a body corporate incorporated under The Companies Act of the Province of Alberta with head office in the City of Edmonton, Province of Alberta, where it carries on the

N OEL, J.:—This is an information in which the plaintiff claims from the defendant payment of the sum of $2,479.22 for sales tax in respect of sales of aerial photographs in the period December 1, 1959 to and including March 31, 1960, penalties for

KEARNEY, J.:—The present appeal is from a decision of the Tax Appeal Board dated April 6, 1961 (26 Tax A.B.C. 243), whereby a tax re-assessment made against the appellant by the respondent, which added, inter alia, $50,000 to the taxpayer’s

CATTANACH, J.:—This is an appeal against the income tax assessment of Twenty Spadina Road Limited, hereinafter called the Company, for the taxation year 1958 whereby the respondent added to the declared taxable income of the Company a sum of $70,156.49 realized

KEARNEY, J.:—The Court is here concerned with an appeal from a decision of the Income Tax Appeal Board reported as No. 565 v. M.N.R., 20 Tax A.B.C. 159, wherein the respondent’s (hereinafter sometimes referred to as ‘‘the taxpayer’’)