Killarney Properties Limited v. 304 ; Minister of National Revenue, [1965] CTC 101, 65 DTC 5060 -- text

KEARNEY, J.:+-This action concerns a profit of $10,957.25 realized by the appellant in its taxation year 1961 on the sale, early in 1961, of a shopping centre which it had caused to be erected on a site consisting of two adjacent parcels of land

Guaranty Trust Company of Canada in the Capacity of Executor of the Will of Dorothy Elgin Towle, Deceased, v. Minister of National Revenue, [1965] CTC 74, 65 DTC 5042 -- text

CATTANACH, J.:—This is an appeal under the Estate Tax Act from the assessment in respect of the estate of Dorothy Elgin Towle who died testate on July 11, 1961.

Minister of National Revenue v. Roland Couture, [1965] CTC 54 -- text

KEARNEY, J.:—Il s’agit ici d’une décision de la Commission d’appel de l’impôt sur le revenu en date du 13 décembre 1951, 28 Tax A.B.C. 358, maintenant l’appel de l’appelant contre une cotisation par laquelle le Ministre ajouta une somme de $11,126.25 au revenu autrement imposable de l’intimé pour l’année 1957.

Hargal Oils Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1965] CTC 50, 65 DTC 5029 -- text

MARTLAND, J. (all concur) :—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Exchequer Court of Canada, which confirmed the decision of the Income Tax Appeal Board that, for the taxation year 1958, the appellant was not entitled to deduct from its income

Minister of National Revenue v. Aldershot Shopping Plaza Limited, [1965] CTC 31, 65 DTC 5018 -- text

CATTANACH, J.:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Tax Appeal Board (34 Tax A.B.C. 429) dated January 31, 1964, whereby an appeal, by the respondent against his income tax assessment for its taxation year 1961, was allowed and the pertinent

Victor Topper v. Minister of National Revenue, [1965] CTC 30, 65 DTC 5018 -- text

DUMOULIN, J.:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Tax Appeal. Board, dated June 28, 1963, respecting the income tax assessments of the appellant for the taxation years 1955, 1956, 1957 and 1958.

At the outset of the hearing, both litigants requested and were granted leave to have this appeal tried and decided on the same evidence and according to the same texts of law and jurisprudence as the joint issue of Harry Topper v. M.N.R., [1965] C.T.C. 22.

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS