FOURNIER, J.:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Income Tax Appeal Board, dated August 14, 1958 (20 Tax A.B.C. 161), allowing in part the respondent’s appeal from an assessment for its taxation year 1955 made and confirmed by the Minister of

DUMOULIN, J.:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Income Tax Appeal Board (1958), 20 Tax A.B.C. 47, dated July 28, 1958, in respect of income tax assessments for five successive years, namely: 1949 to 1953 inclusive.

ADAMSON, C.J.M.:—This is a stated case by Kyle, P.M., under the provisions of Sections 733 to 742 of the Criminal Code, 1953-54, c. 51.

On November 13, 1958, an information was laid alleging that Hart Electronics Limited :

CAMERON, J.:—This is an appeal by Utah Co. of the Americas (hereinafter referred to as ‘‘the appellant”) from a re-assessment to income tax dated July 23, 1957, for its taxation year ending October 31, 1955. The appellant was incorporated under the laws

FOURNIER, J.:—Dans cette cause, il s’agit d’un appel de la décision rendue le ler octobre 1957 par la Commission d’Appel de l’Impôt sur le Revenu accueillant l’appel de l’intimé de cotisations d’impôt sur son revenu pour les années d’imposition 1947 à 1954

THORSON, P.:—This is an appeal from the decision of the Income Tax Appeal Board, sub nomine No. 556 v. M.N.R. (1958), 20 Tax A.B.C. 77, dated August 6, 1958, dismissing the appellant’s appeal against his income tax

GROSCH, J.:—F our separate informations were laid against the respondent Jaques for alleged violation of the provisions of Section 120(1) (a) of the Income Tax Act, reading as follows:

T. O’B. Gore-Hickman:—There are four charges against the accused Joseph Machacek all of the same nature, and being heard and dealt with under the provisions of Part XXIV of the Criminal Code, and this being so I think that the charges might

THE CHIEF Justice:—This is an appeal by Robert B. Curran against the judgment of the Exchequer Court affirming the judgment of the Income Tax Appeal Board, which had dismissed his appeal to it from a re-assessment made under the provisions of the Income Tax Act of the appellant’s income for the taxation year 1951. The re-assessment thus confirmed was with reference to the sum of $250,000 received by the appellant in that year.

THORSON, P.:—This is an appeal against the appellant’s income tax assessment for the taxation year ending January 31, 1953.