Furness Withy & Co. Ltd. v. MNR, 66 DTC 5358, [1966] CTC 482 (Ex Ct), aff'd 68 DTC 5033, [1968] CTC 35, [1968] SCR 221 -- text

THURLOW, J.:—This is an appeal from re-assessments of income tax for each of the years 1957 to 1963 inclusive. The main issue, which is the same in respect of each of the years in question, is whether, or to what extent, amounts which the Minister treated as profits earned by the appellant in Canada are subject to tax having regard to Section 10(1) (c)*[1] of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, c.

Roy A. Hunt, Alfred M. Hunt, Torrence M. Hunt, Roy a Hunt, Jr., Richard McM. Hunt and Mellon National Bank and Trust Company, Executors of the Estate of Rachel Mom. Hunt v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1966] CTC 474, 66 DTC 5322 -- text

JACKETT, P.:—This is a Petition of Right by the Executors of the Estate of Rachel McM. M. Hunt seeking a determination that a writ of fiert facias issued out of this Court did not attach certain shares of Aluminium Limited belonging to

British Columbia Power Corporation, Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1966] CTC 454, 66 DTC 5310 -- text

SHEPPARD, D.J.:—The appeal is by the British Columbia Power Corporation, Ltd. (called B.C. Power) against an assessment by the Minister of National Revenue; a cross-appeal by the Minister has been withdrawn.

British Columbia Power Corporation, Limited, ..... v. Minister of National Revenue, [1966] CTC 451 -- text

SHEPPARD, D.J.:—Dealing with the motion to strike out paragraphs 14, 15 and 19 of the Minister’s reply the ground is raised that the Minister has no right or jurisdiction to appeal against assessment by the Minister. I observe that Section 98, which is the initial section under Division J, or 98(1) in particular, deals with appeals to the Exchequer Court by either the taxpayer or the Minister and the latter part of the section reads :

‘‘And if the appeal is from the Tax Appeal Board.”

M. F. Esson & Sons Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1966] CTC 439, 66 DTC 5303 -- text

THURLOW, J.:—The issue in this appeal, which is from reassessments of income tax for the years 1963 and 1964, is whether the appellant and Esson Motors Limited were, in the taxation years in question, ""associated with each other’’ for the purpose of

Charles Glassman v. Minister of National Revenue, [1966] CTC 374, 66 DTC 5271 -- text

SHEPPARD, D.J.:—This appeal is by Charles Glassman from the assessment by the Minister of National Revenue for the taxation year 1959 in refusing any allowance based on the capital cost of buildings and equipment on Lot 7, Block 63, DL 185, being

Bert Robbins Excavating Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1966] CTC 371, 66 DTC 5269 -- text

CATTANACH, J.:—These are appeals against assessments by the Minister under the Income Tax Act of the appellant for its 1961, 1962 and 1963 taxation years.

By agreement the evidence respecting these appeals was heard immediately following the evidence with respect to the appeals of Alpine Drywall Construction Limited, upon completion of which argument was heard on each set of appeals because the issues involved in each set of appeals were substantially the same, subject only to minor variations consequent upon minor differences in facts.

York, Marble, Tile and Terrazzo Ltd. v. Her Majesty the Queen, [1966] CTC 355, 66 DTC 5210 -- text

GIBSON, J.:—By its Petition of Right the suppliant, a company incorporated under the Ontario Corporations Act, with head office in the City of Toronto, seeks to recover certain moneys paid by it under protest pursuant to a Notice of Assessment

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS