Cameron, J. :—This is an appeal from assessments to income tax made upon the appellant company for each of the fiscal years ending December 31, 1950, 1951 and 1952. The appeal raises the question as to the deductibility of certain expenses incurred by

CAMERON, J.:—This is an appeal from a decision of the Income years 1949 to 1952, both inclusive. It raises a question as to the liability of the appellant to pay income tax on the profits

CAMERON, J.:—This is an appeal by the Minister of National Revenue from two decisions of the Income Tax Appeal Board dated February 10, 1955, which allowed the respondent’s appeals from assessments for the years 1946 and 1947. In his assessment for the

THURLOW, J.:—These are appeals from reassessments of income tax and excess profits tax for the years 1944 and 1945 and of income tax for the years 1949, 1950, 1951, and 1952, all of which reassessments were made by the Minister of National Revenue

FOURNIER, J.:—Dans cette affaire, il s’agit d’un appel d’une décision rendue le 19 janvier 1954 par la Commission d’Appel de l’Impôt sur le revenu, accueillant l’appel de l’intimée, La Société Coopérative de la Vallée d’Yamaska, de cotisations d’impôt sur le revenu

DUMOULIN, J.:—Cette cause fut entendue à Montréal le 24 mai 1956.

DUMOULIN, J.:—Cette cause fut entendue à Montréal le 29 mai 1956.

THORSON, P.:—This is an appeal from the decision of the Income Tax Appeal Board, sub nom. No. 260 v. M.N.R. (1955), 13 Tax A.B.C. 27, dated April 29, 1955, allowing the respondent’s appeal against its income tax assessment

THORSON, P. :—This is an appeal from the decision of the Income Tax Appeal Board, sub nom. No. 280 V. M.N.R. (1955), 13 Tax A.B.C. 362, dated August 30, 1955, allowing the respondent’s appeal from its income tax

THORSON, P.:—This is an appeal from the decision of the Income Tax Appeal Board, sub nom. No. 262 v. M.N.R. (1955), 13 Tax A.B.C. 33, dated May 4, 1954, dismissing the appellant’s appeal against its income tax assessment