Donald Engene Morgan, Maitland Almost, Carlyle a Bodkin and Frank E Cassin v. Minister of National Revenue, [1973] CTC 2192, [1973] DTC 146 -- text

The Chairman (orally):—Basically this is an appeal by Donald Eugene Morgan, but the evidence in this case is to be applied by consent in the appeals of Maitland Almost, Carlyle A Bodkin and Frank E Cassin. The appeals arise out of notices of

Macmillan Bloedel Industries Limited v. Minister of National Revenue, [1973] CTC 299, [1973] DTC 5267 -- text

Collier, J:—The reasons for judgment which I gave in MacMillan Bloedel (Alberni) Limited v MNR (p 295) apply in this appeal in respect to the disallowance by the Minister of the deductions claimed by the appellant

John Christopher Doyle v. Minister of National Revenue, [1970] CTC 356, [1970] DTC 6262 -- text

GIBSON, J.:—This is a separate trial of one part of this appeal and is an appeal from a re-assessment of income, for the 1954 taxation year of the appellant, alleged to have been received by him arising out of a South American transaction.

Pages

Subscribe to Tax Interpretations RSS