L*am Institute of Applied Methodology v. Canada, [1991] 1 CTC 226 -- text
Teitelbaum, J.:—There are three motions to be dealt with pursuant to Rule 324 of the Federal Court Rules. The two motions by the plaintiff are for:
Teitelbaum, J.:—There are three motions to be dealt with pursuant to Rule 324 of the Federal Court Rules. The two motions by the plaintiff are for:
Jerome, A.C.J.:—This is an action brought by the Board of Trustees of the Calgary School District No. 19 (the “ plaintiff") appealing a notice of decision issued by the Minister of National Revenue on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen (the"defendant"). The Minister
MacDonald, C.J.T.D.:—The Crown appeals an order staying proceedings in relation to a charge contrary to paragraph 239(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, Ch. 148, to which the accused pled guilty. The charge relates to the
McNair, J.:—This action is an appeal by the plaintiff from the Minister of National Revenue's reassessment of the amount of federal sales tax levied or imposed on the importation of three shipments of diesel fuel from the United States in the spring of 1986.
Cullen, J.:—
Dickson, C.J. [Per Coram]:—This is an income tax case. The question in the appeal is whether certain dividends received by the wife of the respondent, Jim A. McClurg, in the years 1978,1979, and 1980 in respect of Class B common
Reed, J.:—This is an appeal from a judgment of the Tax Court of Canada dated March 25, 1987, dismissing the plaintiff's appeal from income tax assessments for the taxation years 1982 and 1983. The appeal concerns maintenance payments of $7,380 and $5,760,
Pinard, J.:—This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the reassessment made by the Minister of National Revenue, which served to deny International- Import Customs Brokers Inc. the right to deduct pursuant to subparagraph 20(1)(c)(i) of the Income
Reed, J.:—The issue in this case is a very narrow one: did the plaintiff's purchase of the freehold interest in 200 acres of cranberry lots, on October 14, 1980, result in a merger of that interest and a prior profit à prendre the
Reed, J.:—The issue in this case is whether certain sums ($880,000 and $1,000,000) paid to the plaintiff, in the years 1983 and 1984 respectively, on account of the early termination of leases should be treated for tax purposes as capital gains or as business