Denault, J.:—This is an appeal from a reassessment by Revenue Canada of the plaintiff's corporate income tax return. It involves a deduction made by the plaintiff corporation respecting its contribution to an employee stock option plan. The issue is whether

Muldoon J.:—This lawsuit constitutes an appeal by the plaintiff against a notice of reassessment of income tax effected by the Minister of National Revenue, whereby the Minister disallowed certain expenses relating to a multiple unit residential building (hereinafter: MURB)

No. CA011251, June 26, 1990, Taggart, Hinkson, Toy, JJ.A. (orally), unre- ported;

Lloyds Bank of Canada v. International Warranty Co., [1990] 2 C.T.C. 360; 60

Pinard, J.:—Considering that the Senior Prothonotary's decision involved the exercise of a discretion on his part and the general principle is that the Court sitting on appeal from that decision ought not to interfere with the exercise of that discretion

MacPherson C.J.:—Her Majesty the Queen as represented by the Attorney General of Canada (the"applicant") has applied pursuant to subsection 232(6) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 148 (am. S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 63) (the "Act") for

Donald, J.:—The petitioners claim solicitor-client privilege for documents relating to a tax investigation. The in camera procedure under section 232 of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 148 (am. S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 63) (the

Jewers, J.:—The accused (herein the"applicant") applies under subsection 24(1) of the Charter for a stay of proceedings with respect to charges of income tax evasion against him. The ground of the application is alleged undue delay in the laying of the charges

Master McCallum:—The petitioner here applies by notice of motion for a “declaration that the petitioner has paid maintenance for the support of the respondent in the amount of $1,100 per month from May 1, 1986, to and including December 1, 1990,

Egbert, J:—This is an application pursuant to subsection 232(4) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 148 (am. S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 63) (the "Act"), to determine whether certain documents are protected from disclosure to the respondent

Arkell, J. [Orally]:—Two petitions have been filed pursuant to section 232 of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 148 (am.S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 63) (the "Act"). The action numbers are A902493, which has been referred to as the Zein