Master McCallum:—The petitioner here applies by notice of motion for a “declaration that the petitioner has paid maintenance for the support of the respondent in the amount of $1,100 per month from May 1, 1986, to and including December 1, 1990,
Egbert, J:—This is an application pursuant to subsection 232(4) of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 148 (am. S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 63) (the "Act"), to determine whether certain documents are protected from disclosure to the respondent
Arkell, J. [Orally]:—Two petitions have been filed pursuant to section 232 of the Income Tax Act, R.S.C. 1952, c. 148 (am.S.C. 1970-71-72, c. 63) (the "Act"). The action numbers are A902493, which has been referred to as the Zein
Walsh, J.:—Plaintiff moves for an interim injunction, writ of prohibition, or an order in the nature thereof to prevent the defendant from taking any action with respect to the collection or the obtaining of security with respect to any tax, interest
Dubé, J.:—It is not plain and obvious that the paragraphs in question are irrelevant or may prejudice, embarrass or delay a fair trial under Rule 419(1)(d). The matter ought to be left for the trial judge to decide.
Cullen, J.:—When my reasons for judgment were written I acceded to counsel's request that I reserve my decision on costs to permit each party to make written submissions to the Court on this issue.
Walsh, J.:—This is a tax case in which plaintiff seeks to have his assessment for income tax for the 1983 taxation year varied to reduce his taxable income by $23,128 and accordingly to reduce the tax payable by him. Similarly, he seeks to have his
Pinard, J. [Translation]:—The Court must decide here on the merits of an objection by a third party to the seizure in execution made herein.
Walsh, DJ.:—Defendant moves to strike out plaintiff's statement of claim, together with a finding that the proceedings are " vexatious" within the meaning of section 67 of the Supreme Court Act, R.S.B.C. 1979, c. 379 and amendments thereto, and
