Richard A.C.J.:
This is an appeal from a decision by the Tax Court of Canada dated September 28, 1995 and filed in this Court on September 7, 1995 by statement of claim.
Garon A.C.J.T.C.:
Hamlyn T.C.J.:
This is in the matter of Donald Russell Walsh, Appellant, and Her Majesty The Queen, Respondent. They are appeals with respect to the 1992 and 1993 taxation years.
Joyal J.:
This is an appeal by the Applicants, coupled with an Appeal by the Respondent, with respect to the contents of the record in the Applicants’ application for judicial review.
Teskey T.CJ.:
The Appellant appeals his assessment of income tax for the calendar years 1989, 1990, 1991 and 1992.
Archambault T.C.J.:
Christie A.C.J.T.C.: — This appeal is governed by the informal procedure provided for under section 18 and following sections of the Tax Court of Canada Act. The year under review is 1989.
Bowman J.T.C.C.: — These appeals are from assessments for the appellant’s 1992 and 1993 taxation years. The issues are, for 1992, the deductibility of $4,000.00 claimed by the appellant as child care expenses and, for 1992 and 1993, the inclusion
Taylor J.T.C.C.: — This is an appeal heard in Toronto, Ontario on October 7, 1996, against assessments for the years 1989, 1990 and 1991 in which the Respondent disallowed claims for rental losses in the amounts of $5,044.68, $10,635.44 and
Garon J.T.C.C.: — This is an appeal from an assessment dated December 22, 1995 issued by the Minister of National Revenue pursuant to section 160 of the Income Tax Act. By this assessment, the Minister of National
