Minister of National Revenue v. Mrs. Catherine Spooner, [1928-34] CTC 184, [1920-1940] DTC 258 -- text
Lor Macmillan:—The respondent, Mrs. Spooner, in the year 1927 received a sum of $9,570.41 in circumstances set out in
Lor Macmillan:—The respondent, Mrs. Spooner, in the year 1927 received a sum of $9,570.41 in circumstances set out in
NEWCOMBE, J.:—This is a tax appeal, depending upon the meaning and application of the Income War Tax Act, c. 28 of 1917, as amended.
AUDETTE, J.:—This is an appeal, under the provisions of The Income War Tax Act, 1917, and amendments thereto, from the assessment of the appellant, for the year 1927, on her income received from the Vulcan Oils Ltd., in the
SMITH, J.:—On April 27, 1929, the appellant made a return of his income for the year ending December 31, 1928, which return contained the following entry under Clause 6:
‘‘Income from Dividends ***
AUDETTE, J.:—This is an appeal, under the provisions of The Income War Tax Act, 1917, R.S.C. 1927, c. 97, from the assessment of the appellant, for the year 1928, on that part of his income which he received from the
Durr, C.J.C. (delivering the judgment of the Court orally) :— This appeal arises out of a controversy concerning the assessment of the appellants to income tax in respect of a sum of $77,000 which, the Crown alleges, was a profit ‘‘of’’ the appellants
Macdonald, C.J.B.C.:—I think this is a very clear case of an attempt to tax something which was not income. The family was composed of several members who were attempting to straighten out their affairs and they were not clear about how the property
ANGERS, J.:—It being admitted or established by the evidence that the appellant was a shareholder of the company, that she received in 1929 the sum of $5,439.91 forming the subject of. the present appeal and that this sum represented her share of interest
Lor Tomlin:—The appellant, who is, and at all material times has been, resident in Canada is the sole surviving executor and trustee of the will of Duncan McMartin, who died: on May 2, 1914, domiciled in the Province of Quebec.
Duff, J.:—It is quite plain, I think, that a child does not take, under para. (9), subpara. (f), unless it attains the age of twenty-five years. It is true that the gift over is limited to the case where the child dies before the "period of