SIDNEY SMITH, D.J.:—The appellant appeals from a decision of the Income Tax Appeal Board dismissing his appeal from the Minister of National Revenue on assessments for 1946 and 1947 income tax made under Section 47 of the Income War Tax
THORSON, P.:—This appeal is from the decision of the Income Tax Appeal Board dismissing the appellant’s appeal from his income tax assessment for 1947 whereby the sum of $7,000, which he had shown as a gift on his income tax return, was added as
LORD Reid:—This is an appeal against a judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada dated March 30, 1950 ([1950] C.T.C. 410). By that judgment the Supreme Court reversed a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Alberta dated April 16,
CAMERON, J.:—This is an appeal by the Minister of National Revenue from a decision of the Income Tax Appeal Board dated July 3, 1950. The respondent herein had appealed from an assessment dated June 1, 1949, in respect of one item of his income
SIDNEY SMITH, D.J.:—The appellant appeals from a re-assessment by the Minister of his income for 1944. By this assessment the Minister added $290,000.00 to his income for that year. The transaction on which the Minister based his action was as follows :
ANGERS, J.:—This is an appeal from the judgment of the Income Tax Appeal Board rendered on December 21, 1949, dismissing the appeal of George Edwin Beament to the said Board.
KELLY, J. [In part] :—The final question submitted was:
THORSON, P.:—On July 27, 1950, a certificate made under section 108 of The Income Tax Act, Statutes of Canada, 1948, chapter 52, was registered in this Court showing that certain amounts payable under the Act by the defendant had not been
ANGERS, J.:—This is an appeal under sections 58 and following of the Income War Tax Act, made applicable to matters arising under the provisions of the Excess Profits Tax Act, 1940, in virtue of
SIDNEY SMITH, D.J.:—This case turns on the question whether the appellant company’s profits for 1947 subject to Excess Profits Tax were or should have been reduced by an amount which it claimed should be allowed to meet future depreciation
